M103 vs T-10M | M358 | Armor Penetration Simulation
Simulation of M103 tank projectile hitting the frontal armor of T-10M tank
120mm M358 (23.1 kg AP projectile) at 1000 m/s.
vs
240-250mm Cast 260 BHN Armor at 34-37 degrees
M103 tank 120mm M58 gun muzzle velocity - 1067 m/s (AP). 1000 m/s refers to a distance of approximately 1 km.
Видео M103 vs T-10M | M358 | Armor Penetration Simulation канала Dejmian XYZ Simulations
120mm M358 (23.1 kg AP projectile) at 1000 m/s.
vs
240-250mm Cast 260 BHN Armor at 34-37 degrees
M103 tank 120mm M58 gun muzzle velocity - 1067 m/s (AP). 1000 m/s refers to a distance of approximately 1 km.
Видео M103 vs T-10M | M358 | Armor Penetration Simulation канала Dejmian XYZ Simulations
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
90mm T33 performance (2)The Mystery of the British tungsten alloy APDSTungsten alloy rod vs thin HHS plateProjectile that actually bounces | Hardness vs ToughnessM26E1 vs Tiger II turret edge | T33E7 | Armor Penetration SimulationAPDSHighExplosiveAntimatter ShellA34 Comet vs Panther | Armor Penetration Simulation5cm Pzgr. but with a higher quality of hardening (Armor Penetration)Tungsten Carbide vs Tungsten Alloy | Armor Penetration SimulationSupercharged 76mm M1A2 vs Ferdinand armor version | Armor Penetration SimulationAPFSDS Penetrator vs Tank Gun Barrel SimulationSimplified ERA test (tungsten alloy plate)17pdr AP (2)Fake simulations?? (Armor Penetration)Charioteer vs Jagdtiger | 20pdr Mk 1 APDSSimulation vs Reality | Penetration Process | Tungsten Alloy rodsHow lethal is spalling in the simulationCracked armor | Overpressure SimulationProjectiles collisionT-34 vs M10 Wolverine | Armor Penetration Simulation | APCR