Tungsten alloy rod vs thin HHS plate
OFL-105-G1 rod at 1500m/s vs High Hardness Steel plate
I uploaded this simulation because it shows something interesting. Namely, the rod breaks with a considerable delay from the moment of impact. I used the same models as for the T-72 simulation, but in that case the rod did not break.
Видео Tungsten alloy rod vs thin HHS plate канала Dejmian XYZ
I uploaded this simulation because it shows something interesting. Namely, the rod breaks with a considerable delay from the moment of impact. I used the same models as for the T-72 simulation, but in that case the rod did not break.
Видео Tungsten alloy rod vs thin HHS plate канала Dejmian XYZ
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
APFSDS collision (unrealistically low velocity)Simplified ERA test (tungsten alloy plate)T-72B mod 84 vs 105mm OFL-105-G1 (Armor Penetration)APFSDS vs BLAST-FRAG APS | lateral blast active protection vs long-rod penetrators | Zaslon APSMedieval bombard vs Tiger tank (Armor Penetration Medieval Edition)Mechanical principles part 01155mm M107 High Explosive part 1ACTIVE PROTECTION vs APFSDS | Explosively Formed Penetrator vs APFSDS | Afghanit APSIs Your Car Safe From Supermaneuverable Air-Defense Fighter Aircraft?105mm OFL-105-G1 vs Chieftain (Armor Penetration)5.56x45 mm vs thin modern armorWorld's Longest Home Run (The "Mad Batter" Machine) - Smarter Every Day 2305.56x45mm M193 vs medieval armor (Armor Penetration Medieval Edition)Iron cannonball [Armor Penetration Medieval Edition]Epidemic, Endemic, and Eradication SimulationsMine Blast AnalysisSimple ERA testM1 Abrams vs 120mm Pz. 531 (Armor Penetration)Ansys Workbench explicit dynamic Bullet impact on Titanium plate