Tungsten Carbide vs Tungsten Alloy | Armor Penetration Simulation
Comparison of tungsten carbide with tungsten alloy on the example of APDS Conqueror.
The tungsten alloy in ammunition is used for maximum toughness, while tungsten carbide is very hard but brittle.
Видео Tungsten Carbide vs Tungsten Alloy | Armor Penetration Simulation канала Dejmian XYZ Simulations
The tungsten alloy in ammunition is used for maximum toughness, while tungsten carbide is very hard but brittle.
Видео Tungsten Carbide vs Tungsten Alloy | Armor Penetration Simulation канала Dejmian XYZ Simulations
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
90mm T33 performance (2)The Mystery of the British tungsten alloy APDSTungsten alloy rod vs thin HHS plateProjectile that actually bounces | Hardness vs ToughnessJagdpanther vs Tortoise | 8.8cm Pzgr 39/43 | Armor Penetration SimulationAPDSHighExplosiveAntimatter ShellA34 Comet vs Panther | Armor Penetration SimulationCorner hit | Hellcat vs Tiger | Armor Penetration5cm Pzgr. but with a higher quality of hardening (Armor Penetration)Supercharged 76mm M1A2 vs Ferdinand armor version | Armor Penetration SimulationAPFSDS Penetrator vs Tank Gun Barrel SimulationSimplified ERA test (tungsten alloy plate)10.5cm leFH 18 artillery vs Char B1 bis | Bolted Armor PenetrationFake simulations?? (Armor Penetration)KPz-70 vs Panther armor effectiveness comparison vs early APFSDSRenault FT-17 vs Mark V | Armor Penetration SimulationSimulation vs Reality | Penetration Process | Tungsten Alloy rodsTank tracks penetrationHow lethal is spalling in the simulationCracked armor | Overpressure Simulation