Загрузка страницы

The Angie Housman Case and the Power of DNA Evidence in Solving Crimes

In 1993, a tragic incident occurred when Angie Housman, a nine-year-old girl, went missing while walking home from school in St. Ann, Missouri. Despite an extensive search effort, her lifeless body was discovered nine days later in the August Busch Wildlife Area. The circumstances surrounding her discovery were distressing, as she was found unclothed, restrained, and had succumbed to the harsh elements.

For a quarter of a century, the case remained unresolved, leaving Angie's family and the community burdened with unanswered inquiries and enduring emotional pain. However, a breakthrough emerged in 2019 when DNA evidence connected Earl Cox to this heinous crime. Cox, a known offender with a history of sexual assault, was apprehended and charged with Angie's murder. Eventually, he was convicted and sentenced to spend the rest of his life in prison without the possibility of parole. This closure brought a semblance of justice and relief to Angie's grieving loved ones.

While the true extent of Angie's suffering may forever remain a haunting enigma, her story stands as a stark reminder of the unthinkable atrocities that innocent individuals can endure. It also emphasizes the invaluable role of DNA evidence in resolving criminal cases and underscores the unwavering determination of law enforcement to pursue justice, even when faced with seemingly insurmountable challenges.
⚠️This video is based on a true story, but some events may be inaccurate as it is based on our personal research. Additionally, some events are depicted visually through dramatic reconstruction and do not contain actual footage of the events.
⚠️In this short videos we honor the memories of those who were lost, seek to understand the deeper implications of every tragedy, and hopefully deter some people from making the same mistakes.
⚠️ Copyright Disclaimer

• We use images and content in accordance with the YouTube Fair Use copyright guidelines.

• Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states: “Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.”

• This video may contain certain copyrighted video clips, pictures, or photographs that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for one or more of the reasons noted above.

Видео The Angie Housman Case and the Power of DNA Evidence in Solving Crimes канала MindBlast
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Введите заголовок:

Введите адрес ссылки:

Введите адрес видео с YouTube:

Зарегистрируйтесь или войдите с
Информация о видео
11 октября 2023 г. 22:13:24
00:01:00
Яндекс.Метрика