Therefore, the armor-piercing projectile is much harder than the armor
The simulation was made by mistake, but thought I'd share it.
It could represent anti personnel projectile
Видео Therefore, the armor-piercing projectile is much harder than the armor канала Dejmian XYZ
It could represent anti personnel projectile
Видео Therefore, the armor-piercing projectile is much harder than the armor канала Dejmian XYZ
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
Shaped charge simulation
Fake simulations?? (Armor Penetration)
Ansys Workbench explicit dynamic Bullet impact on Titanium plate
155mm M107 High Explosive part 1
125mm 3БМ-9 APFSDS @ 1800m/s VS 300mm RHA @ 90° Ballistic Simulation
Armstrong 100-ton gun
Medieval bombard vs Tiger tank (Armor Penetration Medieval Edition)
T-72B mod 84 vs 105mm OFL-105-G1 (Armor Penetration)
120mm DM53 APFSDS 1750m/s VS 500mm Tungsten (W)- Ballistic Penetration Simulation - Kinetic Impact
17pdr Armor Piercing
AMX 13/105 vs Tiger II
Tungsten alloy rod vs thin HHS plate
7.5cm PzGr.39 APCBC (790m/s) vs 45mm experimental И-8С HHA at 60° Obliquity. Ballistic Simulation
Armor Penetration Simulation part 3
105mm OFL-105-G1 vs Chieftain (Armor Penetration)
APFSDS vs BLAST-FRAG APS | lateral blast active protection vs long-rod penetrators | Zaslon APS
Armor Simulation Test
A necessary armor penetration phenomenon that you won't find anywhere else
For the Love of Physics - Walter Lewin - May 16, 2011