120mm DM53 APFSDS 1750m/s VS 500mm Tungsten (W)- Ballistic Penetration Simulation - Kinetic Impact
Target Specifications:
Material: Tungsten (W)
Thickness: 500mm
Projectile Specifications:
Caliber: 120mm
Cartridge: DM53 APFSDS
Rod Material: Tungsten Heavy Alloy (WHA)
Impact Velocity: 1750m/s
Impact Obliquity: 0°
Видео 120mm DM53 APFSDS 1750m/s VS 500mm Tungsten (W)- Ballistic Penetration Simulation - Kinetic Impact канала XDYN
Material: Tungsten (W)
Thickness: 500mm
Projectile Specifications:
Caliber: 120mm
Cartridge: DM53 APFSDS
Rod Material: Tungsten Heavy Alloy (WHA)
Impact Velocity: 1750m/s
Impact Obliquity: 0°
Видео 120mm DM53 APFSDS 1750m/s VS 500mm Tungsten (W)- Ballistic Penetration Simulation - Kinetic Impact канала XDYN
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
World of Tanks Kranvagn - 7 Kills 12,3K Damage
THE BEST T-34 IN WAR THUNDER - T-34-85 Gai in War Thunder - OddBawZ
APFSDS vs BLAST-FRAG APS | lateral blast active protection vs long-rod penetrators | Zaslon APS
Rocket Sled Impact Test In Slow-Motion
Ansys Workbench explicit dynamic Bullet impact on Titanium plate
30mm Depleted Uranium Tipped Penetrator APFSDS VS. Composite Armor - Ballistic Simulation Test
125 mm 3BM9 APFSDS-T Vs Leopard 2 # Armor Penetration Simulation
T-72B mod 84 vs 105mm OFL-105-G1 (Armor Penetration)
DEPLETED URANIUM, TUNGSTEN, and STEEL APFSDS | penetration depth comparison
Tracker 2 - APFSDS Failure - Specialised Imaging
Mine Blast Analysis
ACTIVE PROTECTION vs APFSDS | Explosively Formed Penetrator vs APFSDS | Afghanit APS
76mm BR-350A APHE VS 5mm 6061 AL Witness Plates - Blast / Explosive Simulation
Velocity Comparison - 7.62x51 M80 vs DM53 APFSDS vs Railgun HVP vs Hypersonic Cruise Missile
125mm 3БМ-9 APFSDS @ 1800m/s VS 300mm RHA @ 90° Ballistic Simulation
RIBBED ARMOUR vs APFSDS & APDS
APFSDS vs ERA
Peekaboo! Germany 1946 What-If Diorama
APFSDS vs ABRAMS & LEOPARD 2 UPPER PLATE | apfsds critical angle
How Countries Fight Their Wars - Mitsi Studio