125 mm 3BM9 APFSDS-T Vs Leopard 2 # Armor Penetration Simulation
This Video presents 125 mm smooth bar 3VBM3/3BM9/10 APFSDS-T penetration with Leopard 2 tank. This video present the study on leopard front armor plate angle impact on APFSDS. This video highlights various angle of impact. It is observed that, the 3BM9 is failed to penetrate the leopard-2 tank due to its unique front armor plate angle. APFSDS instead of penetrating it slightly deviates upwards.
The Johnson + Cook material model is used for projectile. High velocity of 1800 m/s is applied to the projectile. The leopard tank 2 have composite armor but in present simulation we assumed rolled homogeneous armor as material.
The Leopard 2 is a main battle tank developed by Krauss-Maffei in the 1970s for the West German Army. While 3BM9 is Armour-piercing fin-stabilized discarding sabot tracer or APFSDS-T rounds entered service in 1962 by Soviet Union.
Please subscribe to our channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0UuZWRSqR-qe_bGyXd0jww?sub_confirmation=1
Music Credits: https://www.bensound.com/
Other Similar Videos:
1. 125mm BM15 APFSDS Projectile Vs 250 BHN RHA #Armor Piercing Simulation
https://youtu.be/eAlp_8XdTbM
2. Bullet Penetration Vs Aluminum Plate #Failed Armor Penetration
https://youtu.be/1ZI-RmWWMP8
3.120 mm KE M829A2 APFSDS Vs T44 Tank Armor Inclined Plate
https://youtu.be/yohLMty56P0
4. 7.62 NATO x 51mm Bullet Penetration on Aluminum Plate # Finite Element Analysis , Failed Penetration2
https://youtu.be/L6XrzuAJL-g
5.7.62 NATO X 50 mm Bullet Vs Armor Steel Plate # Armor Penetration Simulation
https://youtu.be/tGYfcFitgMg
6. BM15 APFSDS Vs 250 BHN RHA #Armor Piercing Simulation
https://youtu.be/8c1JyfY9rVU
7.Shot, fixed A.P.T 90 mm T33 Vs Reinforced Concrete and Steel Bars # Armor Piercing Ammunition
https://youtu.be/qAA7cZCKETE
8.7_62X51 mm NATO Vs Bulletproof Steel Vest #Armor Piercing Simulation
https://youtu.be/_gN9GL-V6Kc
9.120 mm M829 APFSDS Vs 125 mm BM 15 APFSDS # APFSDS Collision # Armor Piercing Simulation.
https://youtu.be/hndHEYi5D9E
10.Low Quality Armor Vs Reinforced Concrete and Steel Bars # Armor Piercing simulation
https://youtu.be/B8CXvrqMjRg
11. Pz Kpfw V (Panther) Tank Vs Shot, A.P., 90mm, T33 # Armor Penetration simulation
https://youtu.be/b8GfGRzsIMk
12.125 mm 3BM9 APFSDS-T Vs Leopard 2 # Armor Penetration Simulation
https://youtu.be/Sh-rdpO2dgo
13. 3VBM3/3BM9 APFSDS Vs M829 APFSDS #APFSDS Collision
https://youtu.be/r0X98IBDVmw
14. APFSDS Vs NERA #Non Explosive Reactive Armor
https://youtu.be/BRIuuWmrIqs
Видео 125 mm 3BM9 APFSDS-T Vs Leopard 2 # Armor Penetration Simulation канала Extreme Engineering Simulation
The Johnson + Cook material model is used for projectile. High velocity of 1800 m/s is applied to the projectile. The leopard tank 2 have composite armor but in present simulation we assumed rolled homogeneous armor as material.
The Leopard 2 is a main battle tank developed by Krauss-Maffei in the 1970s for the West German Army. While 3BM9 is Armour-piercing fin-stabilized discarding sabot tracer or APFSDS-T rounds entered service in 1962 by Soviet Union.
Please subscribe to our channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0UuZWRSqR-qe_bGyXd0jww?sub_confirmation=1
Music Credits: https://www.bensound.com/
Other Similar Videos:
1. 125mm BM15 APFSDS Projectile Vs 250 BHN RHA #Armor Piercing Simulation
https://youtu.be/eAlp_8XdTbM
2. Bullet Penetration Vs Aluminum Plate #Failed Armor Penetration
https://youtu.be/1ZI-RmWWMP8
3.120 mm KE M829A2 APFSDS Vs T44 Tank Armor Inclined Plate
https://youtu.be/yohLMty56P0
4. 7.62 NATO x 51mm Bullet Penetration on Aluminum Plate # Finite Element Analysis , Failed Penetration2
https://youtu.be/L6XrzuAJL-g
5.7.62 NATO X 50 mm Bullet Vs Armor Steel Plate # Armor Penetration Simulation
https://youtu.be/tGYfcFitgMg
6. BM15 APFSDS Vs 250 BHN RHA #Armor Piercing Simulation
https://youtu.be/8c1JyfY9rVU
7.Shot, fixed A.P.T 90 mm T33 Vs Reinforced Concrete and Steel Bars # Armor Piercing Ammunition
https://youtu.be/qAA7cZCKETE
8.7_62X51 mm NATO Vs Bulletproof Steel Vest #Armor Piercing Simulation
https://youtu.be/_gN9GL-V6Kc
9.120 mm M829 APFSDS Vs 125 mm BM 15 APFSDS # APFSDS Collision # Armor Piercing Simulation.
https://youtu.be/hndHEYi5D9E
10.Low Quality Armor Vs Reinforced Concrete and Steel Bars # Armor Piercing simulation
https://youtu.be/B8CXvrqMjRg
11. Pz Kpfw V (Panther) Tank Vs Shot, A.P., 90mm, T33 # Armor Penetration simulation
https://youtu.be/b8GfGRzsIMk
12.125 mm 3BM9 APFSDS-T Vs Leopard 2 # Armor Penetration Simulation
https://youtu.be/Sh-rdpO2dgo
13. 3VBM3/3BM9 APFSDS Vs M829 APFSDS #APFSDS Collision
https://youtu.be/r0X98IBDVmw
14. APFSDS Vs NERA #Non Explosive Reactive Armor
https://youtu.be/BRIuuWmrIqs
Видео 125 mm 3BM9 APFSDS-T Vs Leopard 2 # Armor Penetration Simulation канала Extreme Engineering Simulation
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
1 июня 2021 г. 22:48:40
00:01:43
Другие видео канала
ACTIVE PROTECTION vs APFSDS | Explosively Formed Penetrator vs APFSDS | Afghanit APS120 mm M829 APFSDS Vs T44 TankRNTF 21 inch Mark 2 torpedo, 1915H1MIN: APFSDS ShellAnsys Workbench explicit dynamic Bullet impact on Titanium plateAPFSDS vs BLAST-FRAG APS | lateral blast active protection vs long-rod penetrators | Zaslon APSAPFSDS vs NERA | Monolithic & Jacketed Projectiles125mm HE vs SPACED ARMOUR | 3OF19 High Explosive Armour Penetration SimulationMine Blast AnalysisAPFSDS vs ABRAMS & LEOPARD 2 UPPER PLATE | apfsds critical angleAPFSDS Vs NERA #Non Explosive Reactive Armor120 mm KE M829 APFSDS Vs T44 Tank Armor Inclined Plate (Tank Scale 0.25)120 mm M829 APFSDS Vs 125 mm BM 15 APFSDS # APFSDS Collision # Armor Piercing Simulation.War Thunder shell animationNew Main Battle Tank MBT with 130mm cannonLearn Complete ANSYS Workbench in One Video in One hour | ANSYS Tutorial for Beginner By CADD MastreM1 Abrams vs 120mm Pz. 531 (Armor Penetration)Pz Kpfw V (Panther) Tank Vs Shot, A.P., 90mm, T33 # Armor Penetration simulationLow Quality Armor Vs Reinforced Concrete and Steel Bars # Armor Piercing simulationTiger 131 meets Leopard 2 'Face to Face' - Tank Museum, Bovington