APFSDS vs ABRAMS & LEOPARD 2 UPPER PLATE | apfsds critical angle
Monolithic tungsten penetrator vs highly angled RHA plates similar to the upper plate (or hull roof) of the Abrams & Leopard 2 main battle tanks.
Tests conducted with a 25x500mm projectile at 1500m/s impacting a 50mm thick RHA plate to find the critical ricochet angle. The thickness is close, but not identical, to the tanks' plates to reduce the number of simulations needed -the theories and critical angle would remain the same regardless
The critical angle can be increased with an increased impact velocity.
Видео APFSDS vs ABRAMS & LEOPARD 2 UPPER PLATE | apfsds critical angle канала SY Simulations
Tests conducted with a 25x500mm projectile at 1500m/s impacting a 50mm thick RHA plate to find the critical ricochet angle. The thickness is close, but not identical, to the tanks' plates to reduce the number of simulations needed -the theories and critical angle would remain the same regardless
The critical angle can be increased with an increased impact velocity.
Видео APFSDS vs ABRAMS & LEOPARD 2 UPPER PLATE | apfsds critical angle канала SY Simulations
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
![How does a Tank work? (M1A2 Abrams)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/SdL55HWNPRM/default.jpg)
![Inside the Leopard 1A5 - Tank Gunnery Loading](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ovO9MwX5LlU/default.jpg)
![ACTIVE PROTECTION vs APFSDS | Explosively Formed Penetrator vs APFSDS | Afghanit APS](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/YUlNU-uziF4/default.jpg)
![Mine Blast Analysis](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/qAuQrgu2bUE/default.jpg)
![Ansys Workbench explicit dynamic Bullet impact on Titanium plate](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/yrqkWzvcLIA/default.jpg)
![H1MIN: APFSDS Shell](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/JlKZr2lgTac/default.jpg)
![Tank drifting](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/TG-pQbEmjRA/default.jpg)
![M1 Abrams Stuck in Mud / M1A1 OFF Roading](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/TCXwgPZXScM/default.jpg)
![APFSDS vs NERA | Monolithic & Jacketed Projectiles](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/bsU5JlzaOCU/default.jpg)
![125mm 3БМ-9 APFSDS @ 1800m/s VS 300mm RHA @ 90° Ballistic Simulation](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/hh3RPZUghf8/default.jpg)
![M1 Abrams vs 120mm Pz. 531 (Armor Penetration)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/N7aTSjqMyrM/default.jpg)
![WHY THE T14 ARMATA HAS LONGER ERA THAN ANY OTHER TANK | Malachit Explosive Reactive Armour](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/nsJQe3i2dvE/default.jpg)
![120 mm KE M829 APFSDS Vs T44 Tank Armor Inclined Plate (Tank Scale 0.25)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/yohLMty56P0/default.jpg)
![Aluminum bullet impact 01](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/3Hf5VCia64A/default.jpg)
![APFSDS vs BLAST-FRAG APS | lateral blast active protection vs long-rod penetrators | Zaslon APS](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/6hhSMryZaQY/default.jpg)
![COBI 2618 Leopard 2 A4 - Speed Build Review](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/54eRBC0W9SQ/default.jpg)
![RIBBED ARMOUR vs APFSDS & APDS](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/PtHrvpX7URk/default.jpg)
![DEPLETED URANIUM, TUNGSTEN, and STEEL APFSDS | penetration depth comparison](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/PVYKw6L8TMo/default.jpg)
![APFSDS vs ERA](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/zK77-8kJ69c/default.jpg)
![Tiger 131 meets Leopard 2 'Face to Face' - Tank Museum, Bovington](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/3jS5xqSyPbo/default.jpg)