DEPLETED URANIUM, TUNGSTEN, and STEEL APFSDS | penetration depth comparison
Comparison between the penetration depths of Depleted Uranium, Tungsten, and Steel long rod projectiles. The projectile design is kept the same for all materials, with the velocity being altered to maintain a constant amount of kinetic energy for all tests. This effectively simulates them all being fired out of the same cannon with equal amounts of propellant, allowing just the material properties to be compared. The aerodynamic cap and stabilising fins have been neglected from the model for simplicity.
The material properties were taken from literature:
[1]https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/288295107.pdf
[2]https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/4397463.pdf
[3]https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221491471931089X#bib13
To Note:
There are few studies which numerically simulate depleted uranium, so the material properties may not be completely reliable or show certain phenomena. Also, the material may behave slightly better or worse than in reality.
Additionally, the material property type used is that of Johnson-Cook failure, which does not take certain behaviours into account such as 'tip sharpening' or ignition, which people may expect to see.
Видео DEPLETED URANIUM, TUNGSTEN, and STEEL APFSDS | penetration depth comparison канала SY Simulations
The material properties were taken from literature:
[1]https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/288295107.pdf
[2]https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/4397463.pdf
[3]https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221491471931089X#bib13
To Note:
There are few studies which numerically simulate depleted uranium, so the material properties may not be completely reliable or show certain phenomena. Also, the material may behave slightly better or worse than in reality.
Additionally, the material property type used is that of Johnson-Cook failure, which does not take certain behaviours into account such as 'tip sharpening' or ignition, which people may expect to see.
Видео DEPLETED URANIUM, TUNGSTEN, and STEEL APFSDS | penetration depth comparison канала SY Simulations
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
TELESCOPING APFSDS | Rod & Tube APFSDS Armour Penetration Simulation | Unique APFSDS Vol. 1ACTIVE PROTECTION vs APFSDS | Explosively Formed Penetrator vs APFSDS | Afghanit APSOVERPRESSURE SIMULATION | 125mm High Explosive vs Leopard 1 | Pressure Wave Armour PenetrationH1MIN: APFSDS ShellAPFSDS vs BLAST-FRAG APS | lateral blast active protection vs long-rod penetrators | Zaslon APSAPFSDS vs NERA | Monolithic & Jacketed ProjectilesHIDRAULIC PRESS VS THE HARDEST STONES VS TUNGSTENRIBBED ARMOUR vs APFSDS & APDS125mm HE vs SPACED ARMOUR | 3OF19 High Explosive Armour Penetration SimulationAnsys Workbench explicit dynamic Bullet impact on Titanium plateAPFSDS vs ERAAPFSDS vs ABRAMS & LEOPARD 2 UPPER PLATE | apfsds critical angleMine Blast AnalysisTesla Turbine | The interesting physics behind itThe Fluid Effects That Kill PumpsTungsten Thor's Hammer (World's HEAVIEST)How Strong is Tungsten? Hydraulic Press Test!Ammo Types in War Thunder EXPLAINED | War Thunder Tank Shells GuideHow Countries Fight Their Wars - Mitsi StudioWhy The M1 Abrams Uses Depleted Uranium