What Nobody Knows About The 4th Amendment & Exclusionary Rule

What nobody seems to know about the 4th amendment and the exclusionary rule. The SCOTUS says police officers are to be taken for their word at pretrial stages of a criminal case. Evidence beneficial to the defendant doesn't need to be disclosed until much later in the trial, after 97% of cases have already settled with a plea bargain. This is known as a fair trial in our country. Police do not bother to articulate probable cause or reasonable suspicion until they get to court. If they find probable cause for a stop, that is simply a coincidence. Moreover, cops are just as likely to testify to a fabricated version of events rather than the real version even when the truth would have worked just fine. The Los Angeles Sheriff Department for example will ignore vehicles with equipment violations and instead pull over a vehicle doing absolutely nothing illegal based on the appearance of the motorist. You may notice them driving down the street at night shining the light into oncoming traffic to see into each vehicle. What do you suppose they might be looking for? You don't need to shine a light to see traffic violations. And after recording tens of thousands of these stops, they rarely come up with valid reasons at the scene. They make illegal stops all night long because there is no consequence. Obviously that means when its time to go to court, they will need to lie under oath to establish PC. Here is the part you might not have known. Judges don't consider it to be perjury when police officers lie during pretrial motions to suppress evidence. Prosecutors routinely coach the officers or deputy's what needs to be said to pass constitutional hurdles.

Видео What Nobody Knows About The 4th Amendment & Exclusionary Rule канала Tom Zebra