Sovereignty Over the Waterways: Roman vs. Modern Views [No. 86]
Professor Richard Epstein discusses what it means for governments to hold public waterways “in trust.” Modern societies must develop and enforce rules to govern shared waters because of the high demand for the resource. Professor Epstein explains that a simple natural law system, such as Roman law, did not require this governmental oversight. The Romans had limited private usage of water and sparse population, so waterways were never overburdened.
Professor Richard Epstein is the inaugural Laurence A. Tisch Professor of Law at NYU School of Law, a Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, and Professor of Law Emeritus and a senior lecturer at the University of Chicago.
As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.
Subscribe to the series’ playlist:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLWwcngsYgoUUv5NgIyRXaZDVLZ_0jzYPC
Видео Sovereignty Over the Waterways: Roman vs. Modern Views [No. 86] канала The Federalist Society
Professor Richard Epstein is the inaugural Laurence A. Tisch Professor of Law at NYU School of Law, a Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, and Professor of Law Emeritus and a senior lecturer at the University of Chicago.
As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.
Subscribe to the series’ playlist:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLWwcngsYgoUUv5NgIyRXaZDVLZ_0jzYPC
Видео Sovereignty Over the Waterways: Roman vs. Modern Views [No. 86] канала The Federalist Society
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
How Does Federalism Result in More Competent and Competitive Governance? [No. 86]Can Congress Regulate Indian Child Placement? [Briefly: The FedSoc Review]The Flexibility of Contracts [No. 86]How Does the Difficulty of Legislating Protect Federalism? [No. 86]Do Professors at Public Universities Have Free Speech Rights? [Briefly: The FedSoc Review]Do you need to be a classicist to understand Roman Law? [No. 86]Ortiz v. United States [SCOTUSbrief]Are You Bound by a Form You Didn’t Read? [No. 86]Supreme Court Roundup October Term 2021 [SCOTUSbrief]Significant Regulations and OIRA Review [No. 86]Is Originalism Internal or External to the Constitution? [No. 86]Kelo v. City of New London [SCOTUSbrief]How are Natural Rights Related to Just Laws? [No. 86]Hemphill v. New York [SCOTUSbrief]The Financial Frontier: Financial Freedom, Payday Lending, & “Operation Choke Point”Welcome & Plenary Session: Regulatory Review Reset? [EBR Conference]Medical Malpractice in Tort Law: Ordinary Negligence and Recklessness [No. 86]Feddie Night Fights: Criminal (In)Justice?: Is the Push for Decarceration & Depolicing Backfiring?What Makes a Contract Enforceable? [No. 86]A Global Energy Crisis and the FERC: A Discussion of Challenges and Opportunities [Panel Discussion]The Evolution of Antitrust Laws Relating to College Athletics