Are You Bound by a Form You Didn’t Read? [No. 86]
Many transactions in life involve lengthy and complicated forms, like buying a house or renting a car. Most people don’t take the time to read all of the fine print of a standardized contract. Professor Randy Barnett explains that while you are bound by the form you sign, the other party is expected to call attention to any unusual or non-standard requirement in the contract presented.
Professor Randy E. Barnett is the Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Legal Theory at the Georgetown University Law Center, where he teaches Constitutional law and contracts, and is Director of the Georgetown Center for the Constitution.
As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.
Subscribe to the series’ playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLWwcngsYgoUU1K_fK1BEPrzo0skCXeQGk
#law #no86 #lawstudent #lawschool #contractlaw
Видео Are You Bound by a Form You Didn’t Read? [No. 86] канала The Federalist Society
Professor Randy E. Barnett is the Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Legal Theory at the Georgetown University Law Center, where he teaches Constitutional law and contracts, and is Director of the Georgetown Center for the Constitution.
As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.
Subscribe to the series’ playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLWwcngsYgoUU1K_fK1BEPrzo0skCXeQGk
#law #no86 #lawstudent #lawschool #contractlaw
Видео Are You Bound by a Form You Didn’t Read? [No. 86] канала The Federalist Society
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
How Does Federalism Result in More Competent and Competitive Governance? [No. 86]Can Congress Regulate Indian Child Placement? [Briefly: The FedSoc Review]The Flexibility of Contracts [No. 86]How Does the Difficulty of Legislating Protect Federalism? [No. 86]Do Professors at Public Universities Have Free Speech Rights? [Briefly: The FedSoc Review]Do you need to be a classicist to understand Roman Law? [No. 86]Ortiz v. United States [SCOTUSbrief]Supreme Court Roundup October Term 2021 [SCOTUSbrief]Significant Regulations and OIRA Review [No. 86]Is Originalism Internal or External to the Constitution? [No. 86]Kelo v. City of New London [SCOTUSbrief]How are Natural Rights Related to Just Laws? [No. 86]Hemphill v. New York [SCOTUSbrief]The Financial Frontier: Financial Freedom, Payday Lending, & “Operation Choke Point”Welcome & Plenary Session: Regulatory Review Reset? [EBR Conference]Medical Malpractice in Tort Law: Ordinary Negligence and Recklessness [No. 86]Feddie Night Fights: Criminal (In)Justice?: Is the Push for Decarceration & Depolicing Backfiring?What Makes a Contract Enforceable? [No. 86]A Global Energy Crisis and the FERC: A Discussion of Challenges and Opportunities [Panel Discussion]The Evolution of Antitrust Laws Relating to College Athletics