- Популярные видео
- Авто
- Видео-блоги
- ДТП, аварии
- Для маленьких
- Еда, напитки
- Животные
- Закон и право
- Знаменитости
- Игры
- Искусство
- Комедии
- Красота, мода
- Кулинария, рецепты
- Люди
- Мото
- Музыка
- Мультфильмы
- Наука, технологии
- Новости
- Образование
- Политика
- Праздники
- Приколы
- Природа
- Происшествия
- Путешествия
- Развлечения
- Ржач
- Семья
- Сериалы
- Спорт
- Стиль жизни
- ТВ передачи
- Танцы
- Технологии
- Товары
- Ужасы
- Фильмы
- Шоу-бизнес
- Юмор
Factors Associated With Author and Reviewer Declared Use of AI in Medical Journals
The scientific community is divided about the appropriate role of artificial intelligence (AI) in manuscript preparation. In 2023, JAMA Network journals began requiring authors and reviewers to answer questions about use of AI to create or assist in the creation or editing of submitted manuscripts or with preparation of reviews. This study was conducted to assess author and reviewer declarations of such use.
This video was recorded at the 10th Peer Review Congress, September 2025.
Видео Factors Associated With Author and Reviewer Declared Use of AI in Medical Journals канала Peer Review Congress
This video was recorded at the 10th Peer Review Congress, September 2025.
Видео Factors Associated With Author and Reviewer Declared Use of AI in Medical Journals канала Peer Review Congress
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
30 апреля 2026 г. 23:06:58
00:21:45
Другие видео канала
Summary Effect Sizes in Meta-analyses After Removal of Retracted Studies
Optimism Bias in Contemporary National Clinical Trial Network Phase 3 Trials
Geographic and Gender Bias in Peer Review of Applications to the Swiss National Science Foundation
Improving the Research Culture to Increase Credibility of Research Findings
Social Dynamics and Structural Bias in Peer Review, 1865-1965
Statistical Review in Biomedical Journals Can We Get SMARTA Steve Goodman
Association of Trial Registration With Reporting of Clinical Trials
An Artificial Intelligence-Based Tool for Detecting Image Duplication Prior to Manuscript Acceptance
Quantifying and Assessing the Use of Generative AI by Authors and Reviewers...
Reproducible Research Practices in Systematic Reviews of Therapeutic Interventions
Searching for Misconduct and Paper Mills in Peer-Review Comments
Groundwork for the Development of a New Risk of Bias Tool for Network Meta-analysis
A Schema for Collecting Information on Gender, Ethnicity, and Race in Scholarly Publishing
Association of Medical Research Visual Abstract Display With Social Media Driven Site Traffic
Open Science Policies and Practices of Surgical Journals
Industry Funding and Other Financial COI on the Outcomes and Quality of Systematic Reviews
Spin in Published Biomedical Literature: A Systematic Review
Scientific Quality in a Series of Comparative Effectiveness Research Studies
Assessment of Author Demand for Double-blind Peer Review in IOP Publishing Journals
Early Experiences of the Preprint Overlay Journal JMIRx
Effect of Positive vs Negative Reviewer-Led Discussion on Acceptance of Machine Learning Papers
