The Melchizedek Pathway and Rastafari

I hail Haile Selassie I….I hail no other. I give thanks to Igzee’abihier for the “Melchizedek order” through the Christ Lamb, the Christ King, and the soon-coming Christ Priest… There is one Melchizedek, where Christ is the only one…when we speak of Christ, we made reference of the Christ Lamb, Christ King, and Christ Priest…Melchizedek priesthood is not carnal and fleshy, but of moral and spiritual conducts….
After the Deluge, when Scriptures speak of Melchizedek, it refers to the Christ and no one else… all the advents of the Christ manifest the account of Melchizedek, as Christ is the fullness and pathway of Melchizedek. Therefore, Christ as the son of Igzee’abihier stands in the “order’ of Melchizedek, and no one else attains that order. The fullness of the Christ and His manifestation of the First, Second, and Third Advent hold no account of contemporary form…meaning that there would never be two Christ manifesting themselves at the same time. .. man that think in this fashion is not learning.
the Melchizedek pathway is naturally given with the understanding that there’s only ONE Christ, as about the fullness of the Oracle…I say only one Christ as about the Oracle because apart from the divine fullness of the Oracle of the Zion/The Tabernacle, there were other messiahs within Israel (e.g. David, Solomon, etc.…)
Melchizedek sometimes spelled Melchisedech is a very important name mentioned in various Script e.g. The Kebra Nagast, Melchizedek Legend Of 2 (Slavonic) Enoch…..and the ^^ canon version (Bible).
Who is it that argues the point of Abraham and Melchizedek?
A man plundered and becomes confused when thinking that Abraham is above Melchizedek, as the Scripture proves otherwise…

The works of St. Athanasius indicated that Melchizedek was a son of King Melchi and Queen Salem. The work of this writer (St. Athanasius) goes on to explain how Abraham converted Melchizedek to the one true god….However, I see Athanasius's work as controversial and will create an interjectory, as Abraham could not be converting someone already closed to Igzee’abihier. Abraham in his stewardship is much younger than Melchizedek who is hundreds of years older, and walking within the path of Igzee’abihier. It was shown within all versions that Abraham took obeisance to the High Priest Melchizedek who is a High priest in stewardship for the Most High God ….. Abraham, who sees this man above him in statue, took the position being the lower vessel, and he proves this by paying reverence to this High Priest of the Most High God.
The Melchizedek legend of (Slavonic) Enoch (the secret of Enoch) found in English of Dr. Charles’s edition pp 85-93 speaks of the Melchizedek story with great interest where Enoch bless his son Mathuselam/ Methuselah, giving him the succession of the priestly order. (Methuselah and Enoch's other sons constructed an altar at Achuzan where Enoch had been taken up. The word “Achuzan” is the word for “the hill of the Temple of Jerusalem”. In the text, the Slavonic version continues to explain that Igzee’abihier confirmed Methuselah's appointment of the priestly chambers and commanded him at the end of his service to hand the priestly chamber to the second son of his son Lamech. The text does not give any explanation why Noah was not appointed to the priestly duties, but the text indicated that the people accepted Nir, the second son of Lamech and brother of Noah, to the priesthood.
The Rabbonic literature and the Babylonian Talmud give the fullness of this understanding regarding the ascension of Melchizedek to the priestly chambers. It pointed out that Nir, son of Lamech was of great importance within the Slavonic text. Its recording shows that while Nir was High Priest, his wife Sopanima was miraculously impregnated with a child. The child's name was Melchizedek who Nir and his brother Noah took for safety from the discord of his mysterious birth. . During that time, Nir son of Lamech died and the priesthood remains vacant. …
The era of the pre Deluge gives precedence to the priesthood of Enochitic tradition and, however, when the priesthood was mentioned in the era after the Deluge it gives credence to the Noahitic tradition. However, with great understanding, one could see the possibility that Melchizedek was truly a priest within his era, but his priestly activities were taken up by Noah who gives full support to the council of divine worship….Melchizedek priestly orders would not have mentioned within the text of Scriptures if he hadn’t a council of the priesthood. The written text exposes the fact that Melchizedek could have taken up his priesthood role after the Deluge. What then, we can now see that after the flood, the ascension of the Noahitic priestly order was now a transition from the Enochitic order, which Noah passed on to his son Shem, thus giving the substitution of the priestly line Noah – Shem rather than Nir- Melchizedek and then to Noah, etc.

Видео The Melchizedek Pathway and Rastafari канала king m