Filibusters: History, Purpose, & Controversy [POLICYbrief]
In the 1939 classic Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, the fictional Senator Jefferson Smith filibusters on the floor of the Senate for 25 hours in order to delay a bill and block a graft scheme. Smith ended his filibuster by collapsing in a faint.
Though actual filibusters tend to be far less dramatic, they are still regularly utilized by senators to extend debate, block legislation, delay a vote, or achieve legislative consensus. But has the filibuster always been used this way? In this video co-sponsored by the Article I Initiative, Senator Mike Lee (Utah) explores the evolution of the filibuster and its use in the Senate.
As always, the Federalist Society takes no particular legal or public policy positions. All opinions expressed are those of the speaker.
Learn more about Mike Lee:
https://www.lee.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/about-mike
Learn more about the Article I Initiative:
http://www.fedsoc.org/articlei
Related Links & Differing Views:
Congressional Research Service: “Filibusters and Cloture in the Senate”
https://www.senate.gov/CRSpubs/3d51be23-64f8-448e-aa14-10ef0f94b77e.pdf
The New York Times: “The Senate Filibuster, Explained”
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/03/us/politics/filibuster-supreme-court-neil-gorsuch.html
The Atlantic: “The Silenced Majority”
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2009/01/the-silenced-majority/307230/
Claremont Institute: “Against Senate Resolution 355”
https://www.claremont.org/crb/basicpage/against-senate-resolution-355/
The Federalist Society Podcast: “Changing the Rules: The Senate Filibuster”
https://fedsoc.org/commentary/podcasts/changing-the-rules-the-senate-filibuster-podcast
Видео Filibusters: History, Purpose, & Controversy [POLICYbrief] канала The Federalist Society
Though actual filibusters tend to be far less dramatic, they are still regularly utilized by senators to extend debate, block legislation, delay a vote, or achieve legislative consensus. But has the filibuster always been used this way? In this video co-sponsored by the Article I Initiative, Senator Mike Lee (Utah) explores the evolution of the filibuster and its use in the Senate.
As always, the Federalist Society takes no particular legal or public policy positions. All opinions expressed are those of the speaker.
Learn more about Mike Lee:
https://www.lee.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/about-mike
Learn more about the Article I Initiative:
http://www.fedsoc.org/articlei
Related Links & Differing Views:
Congressional Research Service: “Filibusters and Cloture in the Senate”
https://www.senate.gov/CRSpubs/3d51be23-64f8-448e-aa14-10ef0f94b77e.pdf
The New York Times: “The Senate Filibuster, Explained”
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/03/us/politics/filibuster-supreme-court-neil-gorsuch.html
The Atlantic: “The Silenced Majority”
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2009/01/the-silenced-majority/307230/
Claremont Institute: “Against Senate Resolution 355”
https://www.claremont.org/crb/basicpage/against-senate-resolution-355/
The Federalist Society Podcast: “Changing the Rules: The Senate Filibuster”
https://fedsoc.org/commentary/podcasts/changing-the-rules-the-senate-filibuster-podcast
Видео Filibusters: History, Purpose, & Controversy [POLICYbrief] канала The Federalist Society
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
How Does Federalism Result in More Competent and Competitive Governance? [No. 86]Sovereignty Over the Waterways: Roman vs. Modern Views [No. 86]Feddie Night Frights: Return of the Living Constitution?How Does the Difficulty of Legislating Protect Federalism? [No. 86]Do Professors at Public Universities Have Free Speech Rights? [Briefly: The FedSoc Review]Introduction to the Intellectual Property Working GroupVictoria Lipnic: A View from the Top: DOL, EEOC, and NLRBAddress by Senator Michael S. Lee [NLC 2022]Ortiz v. United States [SCOTUSbrief]Are You Bound by a Form You Didn’t Read? [No. 86]Congress as Elephant [Article I Initiative]Supreme Court Roundup October Term 2021 [SCOTUSbrief]Mark Rienzi: The Administrative State and Religious FreedomSignificant Regulations and OIRA Review [No. 86]Is Originalism Internal or External to the Constitution? [No. 86]Kelo v. City of New London [SCOTUSbrief]How are Natural Rights Related to Just Laws? [No. 86]Hemphill v. New York [SCOTUSbrief]A License to Massage a Horse? [Preview]The Financial Frontier: Financial Freedom, Payday Lending, & “Operation Choke Point”Regulatory Elephants in Statutory Mouse Holes [NLC 2022]