Appealing Design: design based planning appeals, has the tide turned?
Research findings from the Place Alliance.
00:00:00 - Introduction. Katja Stille, Urban Design Group (Chair)
00:03:21 - Appealing Design research findings. Matthew Carmona, The Bartlett, UCL | Chair of the Place Alliance.
00:18:16 - Response from Joanna Averley, Chief Planner, DLUCH
00:28:02 - Response from Tim Crawshaw, President, Royal Town Planning Institute
00:34:03 - Response from Justin Webber, Senior Building Conservation Officer, Leicester City Council
00:40:14 - Response from David Morgan, Professional Lead for Planning Appeals, Planning Inspectorate
00:47:12 - Response from Christine Thorby. Urban Design Learning
00:52:17 - Concluding questions and answers from the panel.
Summary of the research background:
Is the planning appeal process giving any weight to design quality, and rejecting applications for poor and mediocre housing development? Surprising answers are contained in Appealing Design, a new study of over 30 planning appeals, launched at this UDG event.
For decades local planning authorities up and down the country have been reluctant to refuse poorly designed residential and other developments on design grounds.
Six perceptions have underpinned this reluctance:
1: Costs will be awarded against the planning authority should it lose the appeal
2: Design is too subjective to argue easily
3: Quantity and demonstrated housing land supply is given a greater weight than quality of design
4: Housebuilders are too formidable to take on.
5: Negotiating good design with an applicant takes too long and requires too much officer time
6: Design can be dealt with after the principle of development has been established
Drawing on recent planning appeals data, this new Place Alliance report reveals that none of these perceptions are any longer true (some never were).
Appealing Design is supported and endorsed by Civic Voice, the RTPI, the Urban Design Group and Urban Design Learning.
Видео Appealing Design: design based planning appeals, has the tide turned? канала UrbanNous
00:00:00 - Introduction. Katja Stille, Urban Design Group (Chair)
00:03:21 - Appealing Design research findings. Matthew Carmona, The Bartlett, UCL | Chair of the Place Alliance.
00:18:16 - Response from Joanna Averley, Chief Planner, DLUCH
00:28:02 - Response from Tim Crawshaw, President, Royal Town Planning Institute
00:34:03 - Response from Justin Webber, Senior Building Conservation Officer, Leicester City Council
00:40:14 - Response from David Morgan, Professional Lead for Planning Appeals, Planning Inspectorate
00:47:12 - Response from Christine Thorby. Urban Design Learning
00:52:17 - Concluding questions and answers from the panel.
Summary of the research background:
Is the planning appeal process giving any weight to design quality, and rejecting applications for poor and mediocre housing development? Surprising answers are contained in Appealing Design, a new study of over 30 planning appeals, launched at this UDG event.
For decades local planning authorities up and down the country have been reluctant to refuse poorly designed residential and other developments on design grounds.
Six perceptions have underpinned this reluctance:
1: Costs will be awarded against the planning authority should it lose the appeal
2: Design is too subjective to argue easily
3: Quantity and demonstrated housing land supply is given a greater weight than quality of design
4: Housebuilders are too formidable to take on.
5: Negotiating good design with an applicant takes too long and requires too much officer time
6: Design can be dealt with after the principle of development has been established
Drawing on recent planning appeals data, this new Place Alliance report reveals that none of these perceptions are any longer true (some never were).
Appealing Design is supported and endorsed by Civic Voice, the RTPI, the Urban Design Group and Urban Design Learning.
Видео Appealing Design: design based planning appeals, has the tide turned? канала UrbanNous
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
Massive Small. The Compendium. (Part 2) Smart Urbanism in an upside down worldUrban design analysis, concept and proposals for a new film and tv studio campus.Essential Urban Design & A Beginner's Guide to Urban Design and Development unpacked by the authorsMaking travel by public transport a joy: The role of Behavioural Science.The Urban Design Skills Survey Report: The Design Deficit.The Urban Masterplanning Handbook (Two of Three)Design Value vs the Value of Design. An Urban Design Group ideasSpace discussion.Achieving a pedestrian friendly city centre. Auckland. New Zealand.People friendly places are planet friendly places: How can outstanding urban design become the norm?Why are cars frequently provided with more space than our homes?Belgrade: Shifting identities of the capital.Hans Monderman: Rethinking the design of streets and public space.Housing, Public Realm and Parks. Part Two. An Urban Design Group Webinar.The London View Management Framework. (LVMF). A UDL PresentationTowns and cities: Function in form.Tall Buildings and SustainabilityCan Copenhagen progress from being the cycling capital of the world to being a car free city?Diversity and Inclusion in Urban Design Education. A UDG ideasSpace presentation.Better Streets Summit: The High Street EcosystemUrbanism. By Design: Ease of MovementFuture Planning, Beauty and Local Communities: The Rewards and Challenges.