Why did Roman armies adopt the Spatha & abandon the Gladius?
The Roman military of he Republican and Pricipate periods seemed to have a winning combination of gladius, and scutum (the rectangular Roman shield). And yet, starting at some point in the late secondr early third century AD, both of these began to be phased out, and the Romans would adopt a new sword--the spatha. Why did they do this? This video atttempts some sort of an answer.
Видео Why did Roman armies adopt the Spatha & abandon the Gladius? канала The Historian's Craft
Видео Why did Roman armies adopt the Spatha & abandon the Gladius? канала The Historian's Craft
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
The Ransom of the Soul: Afterlife & Wealth in Early Western Christianity, Peter BrownLittle Boots! Did Caligula's nickname ever piss off the Roman Emperor?BOOK REVIEW: The Dark Valley, A Panorama of the 1930s, Piers BrendonTaxes & Gunpowder: The Rise of the Modern StateBOOK REVIEW: Premodern Japan (2nd ed.), Hane & PerezBOOK REVIEW: The Third Reich in Power, Richard EvansLate Roman HelmetsAndrade's "The Gunpowder Age": Chinese military history & gunpowder warfareThe Subarmalis: A Roman Gambeson?The Supreme Ultimate: the North Star's impact on Japan's East Asian WarTattoos, Barbarians, & Barbarian Imagery in the Late Roman ArmyRomans & non Romans: Ethnicity in the Ancient World, pt. 2Stephenson's "Romano Byzantine Infantry Equipment": some further thoughtsTanegashima Teppo: Matchlocks & Gunpowder Warfare in the Sengoku JidaiStorm From the Steppes: The Huns, pt. 4Theodoric & Justinian's Reconquests, ep 7The Age of the Samurai pt 5: The Coming of the WarriorWWII Through Japanese Eyes: cultural color schemes & mentalitiesJapan to 1868 pt 7: The Kamakura Shogunate & BuddhismJoya de Ceren: The American PompeiiGallic Walls & Fortifications in the 3rd & 4th centuries