155mm M107 High Explosive part 2
First of all, mantlet model is not perfect, but previous tests have shown that this type of explosion does not affect thick armor too much.
The main target is the roof of the Leopard 1 hull, which is 30mm thick.
For 155mm M107 were two types of filler. This time I used stronger one - 7kg Composition B.
Видео 155mm M107 High Explosive part 2 канала Dejmian XYZ
The main target is the roof of the Leopard 1 hull, which is 30mm thick.
For 155mm M107 were two types of filler. This time I used stronger one - 7kg Composition B.
Видео 155mm M107 High Explosive part 2 канала Dejmian XYZ
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
Rocket Sled Impact Test In Slow-MotionH1MIN: APFSDS ShellRNTF 21 inch Mark 2 torpedo, 1915H1MIN: WWII VT FuzeAPFSDS vs BLAST-FRAG APS | lateral blast active protection vs long-rod penetrators | Zaslon APST-72B mod 84 vs 105mm OFL-105-G1 (Armor Penetration)Shaped Charge7.5cm PzGr.39 APCBC (790m/s) vs 45mm experimental И-8С HHA at 60° Obliquity. Ballistic SimulationCFD simulation of a bullet firedMine Blast AnalysisLanz-Odermatt formula vs my armor modelAnsys Workbench explicit dynamic Bullet impact on Titanium plateACTIVE PROTECTION vs APFSDS | Explosively Formed Penetrator vs APFSDS | Afghanit APSDEPLETED URANIUM, TUNGSTEN, and STEEL APFSDS | penetration depth comparisonElbit Systems / 155mm M454 Super High Explosive Artillery ProjectileTANK BUSTING 57mm Auto-Cannon | T18B-2 (War Thunder)Bullet Penetration in Ansys Explicit Dynamics Autodyn Part 1Tracker 2 - APFSDS Failure - Specialised ImagingWHY THE T14 ARMATA HAS LONGER ERA THAN ANY OTHER TANK | Malachit Explosive Reactive Armour