Comparison of U-Pu and Th-U Cycles in MSR - Jiri Krepel @ ThEC2018
Objective comparison of the U-Pu & Th-U from a purely neutronic perspective.
When fuel cycle parameters: power, reprocessing scheme, feed composition, etc. are fixed, reactor will converge to equilibrium state / fuel composition. The composition depends on feed type 238U or 232Th and on the reactor spectrum.
The spectrum is determined by scattering materials. Equilibrium composition and spectrum determine the multiplication factor. Equilibrium is inherent core state (composition, spectrum, reactivity). Equilibrium reactivity indicates neutron efficiency of the core and its capability for breeding in closed fuel cycle.
Better performance: Th-U in thermal and U-Pu in fast spectra. Graphite moderated MSR only in Th-U. Fluorides fast MSFR possible in both cycles (equal performance). Chlorides fast MSR maximum reactivity in both cycles. B&B possible for U-Pu.
Parasitic captures strongly differ between reactors.
- 20% in fast & up to 40 % in thermal Th-U cycle.
- 30% in fast & up to 120 % in thermal U-Pu cycle.
- Reactivity loss in Th-U is much lower (1/3 in thermal, 2/3 in fast case).
Th-U: lower ν and lower parasitic capture of 233U, breeding also in thermal spectrum.
U-Pu: higher ν and higher parasitic capture of 239Pu, better performance in fast spectra.
Th-U high efficiency.
U-Pu high economy.
Jiri Krepel | Advanced Nuclear System Group | Paul Scherrer Institute
This talk was captured at Thorium Energy Conference 2018 (ThEC2018) in Brussels, Belgium. The footage may be recycled by https://ThoriumRemix.com/ for narrative purposes. Thorium Energy (World) conferences can be found here: http://www.thoriumenergyworld.com/
ThEC2018 videos are collected in this ThEC2018 Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKfir74hxWhPll2rp9pJO2oiCceFccHls
Видео Comparison of U-Pu and Th-U Cycles in MSR - Jiri Krepel @ ThEC2018 канала gordonmcdowell
When fuel cycle parameters: power, reprocessing scheme, feed composition, etc. are fixed, reactor will converge to equilibrium state / fuel composition. The composition depends on feed type 238U or 232Th and on the reactor spectrum.
The spectrum is determined by scattering materials. Equilibrium composition and spectrum determine the multiplication factor. Equilibrium is inherent core state (composition, spectrum, reactivity). Equilibrium reactivity indicates neutron efficiency of the core and its capability for breeding in closed fuel cycle.
Better performance: Th-U in thermal and U-Pu in fast spectra. Graphite moderated MSR only in Th-U. Fluorides fast MSFR possible in both cycles (equal performance). Chlorides fast MSR maximum reactivity in both cycles. B&B possible for U-Pu.
Parasitic captures strongly differ between reactors.
- 20% in fast & up to 40 % in thermal Th-U cycle.
- 30% in fast & up to 120 % in thermal U-Pu cycle.
- Reactivity loss in Th-U is much lower (1/3 in thermal, 2/3 in fast case).
Th-U: lower ν and lower parasitic capture of 233U, breeding also in thermal spectrum.
U-Pu: higher ν and higher parasitic capture of 239Pu, better performance in fast spectra.
Th-U high efficiency.
U-Pu high economy.
Jiri Krepel | Advanced Nuclear System Group | Paul Scherrer Institute
This talk was captured at Thorium Energy Conference 2018 (ThEC2018) in Brussels, Belgium. The footage may be recycled by https://ThoriumRemix.com/ for narrative purposes. Thorium Energy (World) conferences can be found here: http://www.thoriumenergyworld.com/
ThEC2018 videos are collected in this ThEC2018 Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKfir74hxWhPll2rp9pJO2oiCceFccHls
Видео Comparison of U-Pu and Th-U Cycles in MSR - Jiri Krepel @ ThEC2018 канала gordonmcdowell
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
ACU NEXT Molten Salt Loop - Tim Head @ ThEC2018Thorcon 2021-10 Update - Lars Jorgensen @ ORNL MSRW 2021Advancing Thorium Molten Salt Reactor R&D - Rusty Towel of ACU NEXT @ ThEC2018Flibe Energy's Matthew Lish - LFTR Online Chemistry vs Radiation @ ORNL MSRW 2019Alberta Nuclear Power - Calgary PanelDaniel Cooper the Chief Chemist of Seaborg Technologies @ ThEC2018Molten Salt Thermal Conductivity (Presentation+Interview) Dianne Ezell & Ryan Gallagher @ ORNL MSRWHow to make PlutoniumThorium Debate / Molten Salt Reactor Forum @ ThEC2018Ed Pheil & Carl Perez of Elysium Industries Molten Salt Chloride Fast ReactorThorCon's Thorium Converter Reactor - Lars Jorgensen in BaliPrinciples of Thermal, Fast and Breeder ReactorsMSR Irradiation Program at NRG Petten - Ralph Hania @ ThEC2018IMSR (Integral Molten-Salt Reactor) Before 2030 - Dave Hill of Terrestrial Energy @ ORNL MSRW 2020Copenhagen Atomics - Thomas Jam Pedersen @ TEAC10Dr. Richard Steeves - Alvin Weinberg's book "The First Nuclear Era" @ TEAC10DFR: the Dual-Fluid Reactor - Jan-Christian Lewitz @ ThEC2018Elysium Industries MCSFR (Molten Chloride Salt Fast Reactor) - Ed Pheil @ TEAC10Dr. David LeBlanc @ TEAC7 - IMSR: Terrestrial Energy's Integral Molten Salt Reactor