History of Title IV D Child Support Secrets - Molly K. Olson
Molly K. Olson provides the history and evolution of the massive unwarranted and unauthorized overreach of the federal/state/county Title IV-D child support agency program into the private lives of families. Contrary to Congressional intent, the agency works to build their agency. Congressional intent is "cost recovery" and "cost avoidance" of government Title IV-A public assistance programs.
Instead, to grow the agency, this government program is incentivizing the removal of one parent (most commonly the father) without just cause. The IV-D child support agency DOES NOT represent children!
Congress never intended this program to be "for children" or for all nonpublic assistance cases; nor did Congress intend for this program for involved fathers. The IV-D program is a massive waste of taxpayer money, in violation of Congressional intent; the IV-D agency is damaging children (and society) by incentivizing fatherlessness.
This program must be reigned in to achieve the original intent and to limit the use of this agency in private cases. This program was meant for dads who had abandoned their children to public assistance.
This program should NOT be used and should be allowed to intervene when there is an involved father who is fulling supporting his children. This program should be restricted to states that support equal parenting time for fit, loving, responsible dads who are ready, willing, and able to step up to the plate to share equally in the responsibility of raising their kids.
It is wrong for a government agency to incentivize fatherlessness, restrict children's time with fit fathers, and then penalize fathers for not being involved. This must stop.
Видео History of Title IV D Child Support Secrets - Molly K. Olson канала Center For Parental Responsibility
Instead, to grow the agency, this government program is incentivizing the removal of one parent (most commonly the father) without just cause. The IV-D child support agency DOES NOT represent children!
Congress never intended this program to be "for children" or for all nonpublic assistance cases; nor did Congress intend for this program for involved fathers. The IV-D program is a massive waste of taxpayer money, in violation of Congressional intent; the IV-D agency is damaging children (and society) by incentivizing fatherlessness.
This program must be reigned in to achieve the original intent and to limit the use of this agency in private cases. This program was meant for dads who had abandoned their children to public assistance.
This program should NOT be used and should be allowed to intervene when there is an involved father who is fulling supporting his children. This program should be restricted to states that support equal parenting time for fit, loving, responsible dads who are ready, willing, and able to step up to the plate to share equally in the responsibility of raising their kids.
It is wrong for a government agency to incentivize fatherlessness, restrict children's time with fit fathers, and then penalize fathers for not being involved. This must stop.
Видео History of Title IV D Child Support Secrets - Molly K. Olson канала Center For Parental Responsibility
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
30 августа 2019 г. 19:06:30
01:05:26
Другие видео канала
Legally Speaking: Antonin ScaliaShocking Facts On The Child Support System Exposed By Breakthrough Study7. Site Restoration LawLawsuit Against Child Support (Get Them Out Of Your Life)5 Lawsuits Against Child Support (You Can Win)Introduction to Constitutional Law: 100 Supreme Court Cases Everyone Should KnowTitle IV-E and Child WelfareChris Henry on Suing Judges and Support Magistrates And Taking Your Divorce To Federal CourtHow to File a Motion in Family CourtFATHER FILED LAWSUIT & WON. You Can Defeat Child Support in Federal And State Courts. HOORAY!GET BACK My $1,200 And $600 Stimulus Checks From Child Support. Extra Funds Available for Fathers.Show Me Arrears Immediately (STOP THE INCREASE)The History of Child SupportTEXAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL CHILD SUPPORT. How to reduce your payments or escape the fraudulent programEP 18. The Respondent w Public Enemy #1 of Divorce Lawyer Lobbyists Molly K Olson (Full Interview)Technology-Enabled Disruption ConferenceNO ATTORNEY. YOUR Rights to Access The Court and Stop PaymentsSTOP Income Withholding For Child SupportCourt Rules Best interest of the Child is with her track team, not the father! 1-2Kester matter before Rhonda Forsberg Family Court Judge Clark County Nevada 12/10/20