CRITICAL THINKING - Fallacies: Equivocation [HD]
Joseph Wu (University of Cambridge) explains the fallacy of equivocation, the fallacy that occurs when the same term is used with different meanings in an argument. Along the way, he discusses whether Miley Cyrus is an exploding ball of gas.
Help us caption & translate this video!
http://amara.org/v/HWfP/
Видео CRITICAL THINKING - Fallacies: Equivocation [HD] канала Wireless Philosophy
Help us caption & translate this video!
http://amara.org/v/HWfP/
Видео CRITICAL THINKING - Fallacies: Equivocation [HD] канала Wireless Philosophy
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
CRITICAL THINKING - Cognitive Biases: The GI Joe Fallacy [HD]CRITICAL THINKING - Fallacies: Fallacy of DivisionCRITICAL THINKING - Fundamentals: Bayes' Theorem [HD]EquivocationCRITICAL THINKING - Fallacies: Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc [HD]CRITICAL THINKING - Fallacies: Ad Hominem [HD]PHILOSOPHY - Epistemology: The Problem of Skepticism [HD]CRITICAL THINKING - Fundamentals: Introduction to Critical Thinking [HD]Fallacy of Equivocation (See links below for more video lectures on Types of Informal Fallacies)PHILOSOPHY - Epistemology: Three Responses to Skepticism [HD]What is Critical Thinking ?- Umar RiazTop 10 Logical FallaciesCRITICAL THINKING - Cognitive Biases: Peak-End Effect [HD]12 Cognitive Biases Explained - How to Think Better and More Logically Removing BiasEquivocation Fallacy - With Simple, Practical, and Philosophical ExamplesCRITICAL THINKING - Fallacies: Fallacy of CompositionEquivocation (Logical Fallacy)CRITICAL THINKING - Fundamentals: Validity [HD]CRITICAL THINKING - Fundamentals: Correlation and Causation