Equivocation Fallacy - With Simple, Practical, and Philosophical Examples
The fallacy of equivocation (also called the fallacy of ambiguity) is the fallacy whereby one incorrectly reasons that a conclusion follows from a premises but if the terms in the argument were properly distinguished, the conclusion would not follow. I characterize this fallacy in terms of three conditions. Namely, one commits the fallacy when:
1. There is an ambiguous term in the argument.
2. The ambiguous terms are disambiguated when evaluating the premises so as to make the premises true (or at least reasonable)
3. The ambiguous terms are taken to have the same meaning so that the conclusion can be said to follow from the premises
** This is a reupload of an earlier video I did on the Equivocation Fallacy. I didn't like the organization of the first upload.
🌐 SUBSCRIBE to my channel for more videos: https://goo.gl/ukVPLo
Follow me on Twitter ➡️ https://twitter.com/davidagler
Credits & Sources
* Warren, Mary Anne. 1973. “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion.” The Monist 57 (1): 43–61.
* Overview of Mary Anne Warren's "On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion" - Julinna Oxley: https://youtu.be/4sDUoF9dAG0
* An excellent thesis on the argument by analogy: Neil, Paul E Mac. 1993. “The Fallacy of Equivocation.” McMaster University.
* Fat Politics by J. Eric Oliver (Amazon affiliate link: https://amzn.to/2Ouofd7). You can also visit Oliver's website here: https://www.jericoliver.com/
* Video of Flags / Politics: Video by cottonbro from Pexels
* Fireworks video: Video by Anthony from Pexels
* Person running: Video by Pressmaster from Pexels
* Pills: Video by Tima Miroshnichenko from Pexels
* Video of Forest by Kelly Lacy from Pexels
* Apologies if I forgot to credit you!
The thumbnail is by Arthur Ignatius Keller (1866-1924) titled "Take your hands off me". It was published in "Black Cargo" by J.P. Marquand, Saturday evening post, 197:3 (Sept. 20, 1924).
Видео Equivocation Fallacy - With Simple, Practical, and Philosophical Examples канала Logic & Philosophy
1. There is an ambiguous term in the argument.
2. The ambiguous terms are disambiguated when evaluating the premises so as to make the premises true (or at least reasonable)
3. The ambiguous terms are taken to have the same meaning so that the conclusion can be said to follow from the premises
** This is a reupload of an earlier video I did on the Equivocation Fallacy. I didn't like the organization of the first upload.
🌐 SUBSCRIBE to my channel for more videos: https://goo.gl/ukVPLo
Follow me on Twitter ➡️ https://twitter.com/davidagler
Credits & Sources
* Warren, Mary Anne. 1973. “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion.” The Monist 57 (1): 43–61.
* Overview of Mary Anne Warren's "On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion" - Julinna Oxley: https://youtu.be/4sDUoF9dAG0
* An excellent thesis on the argument by analogy: Neil, Paul E Mac. 1993. “The Fallacy of Equivocation.” McMaster University.
* Fat Politics by J. Eric Oliver (Amazon affiliate link: https://amzn.to/2Ouofd7). You can also visit Oliver's website here: https://www.jericoliver.com/
* Video of Flags / Politics: Video by cottonbro from Pexels
* Fireworks video: Video by Anthony from Pexels
* Person running: Video by Pressmaster from Pexels
* Pills: Video by Tima Miroshnichenko from Pexels
* Video of Forest by Kelly Lacy from Pexels
* Apologies if I forgot to credit you!
The thumbnail is by Arthur Ignatius Keller (1866-1924) titled "Take your hands off me". It was published in "Black Cargo" by J.P. Marquand, Saturday evening post, 197:3 (Sept. 20, 1924).
Видео Equivocation Fallacy - With Simple, Practical, and Philosophical Examples канала Logic & Philosophy
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
![What is the Meaning of Life - P2 by Ryan Pollock (Well-Being, Happiness, and Loss of Meaning)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/5YobbQ8kHYk/default.jpg)
![Propositional Logic Proofs: Two Types of Derivation Rules (Intelim)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/qVod_pkwaH0/default.jpg)
![Four-Dimensionalism, Temporal Parts, Material Coincidence, and the Humanistic Consequences of 4D](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/5mOAuQO9U0c/default.jpg)
![Typeset Natural Deduction Proofs (Fitch) in LaTeX using proofpack](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/8ff3tPF0YQ4/default.jpg)
![Propositional Logic: Translation, Part 1 (Atomic and Negated Wffs)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/J2byFuZEGFI/default.jpg)
![Predicate Logic Proofs (PRACTICE), Part 2](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/0cgwVkCpE38/default.jpg)
![Predicate Logic, Proofs (Universal Introduction)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/koWE494S5nc/default.jpg)
![Predicate Logic: Symbols](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/PTwGnYh0nS4/default.jpg)
![Letting the Child Drown - Moral Indifference in a World of Possible Worlds](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/551o60khB3g/default.jpg)
![Argument from Fallacy - Fallacy 7 #logic #fallacy](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/tIRTfzPZ17Y/default.jpg)
![Hedonism - A better life through the pursuit of pleasure](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/IreaA7emE4w/default.jpg)
![Loyalty as a moral and prudential good - Josiah Royce, Part 2](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ers6losmII0/default.jpg)
![Pragmatism - Ad](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Vw1zIMTZv98/default.jpg)
![Logic Puzzle 5 - Budget Cuts for the NMCP](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/mJLCJXnung4/default.jpg)
![Normal Forms in Propositional Logic - At a Snail's Pace](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/k0azJlv-TTE/default.jpg)
![Intentional fouls and morality](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/CEiOPN_QkgU/default.jpg)
![How to Create a QR Code with Python and Segno](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/go8oId63RJM/default.jpg)
![Objections To Loyalty Ethics - Josiah Royce, Part 5](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/biULpRWbFmo/default.jpg)
![Ethics of Loyalty - Josiah Royce, Part 4](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/m6nHfGmLDzU/default.jpg)
![Ad Hominem Fallacy - Simply Explained](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/iAiZuIkEHyY/default.jpg)
![Journalism, Errors, and Responsibility (When journalists are morally responsible for their errors)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/G3TvDoOZpAY/default.jpg)