Professor Francis Pakes examines penal exceptionalism in 21st century Iceland
The article, "A more Nordic Norway? Examining penal exceptionalism in 21st century Iceland" by Francis Pakes, University of Portsmouth and Helgi Gunnlaugsson, University of Iceland was published in the Howard Journal of Crime and Justice.
John Pratt (2008) put Nordic penal exceptionalism firmly on the criminological agenda describing penal practice in Norway, Sweden and Finland. This was then placed in sharp contrast with Anglophone penal excess in Pratt and Eriksson’s subsequent book (2011). Pratt travelled to the Nordic countries to establish why penal practice was restrained, positive and generally form an exception to penal trends worldwide. Ironically, the key ingredient of exceptionalism is in fact its semantic opposite, normalisation. It refers to efforts to maintain in prison life as state of normality, for prison life to be as ‘normal’ as possible in order to facilitate Nordic prisons’ main objective of preparing prisoners for a return to society. The common phrase used is that Nordic prisons are places of punishment but not places for punishment: the deprivation of liberty is in the fact the punishment whilst the stay in prison should facilitate a prisoner’s betterment or personal growth. Using Norway as a comparator, this article explores the Icelandic approach to prisons to see if it has something fresh to offer.
Read the article here: https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12244
Видео Professor Francis Pakes examines penal exceptionalism in 21st century Iceland канала Howard League
John Pratt (2008) put Nordic penal exceptionalism firmly on the criminological agenda describing penal practice in Norway, Sweden and Finland. This was then placed in sharp contrast with Anglophone penal excess in Pratt and Eriksson’s subsequent book (2011). Pratt travelled to the Nordic countries to establish why penal practice was restrained, positive and generally form an exception to penal trends worldwide. Ironically, the key ingredient of exceptionalism is in fact its semantic opposite, normalisation. It refers to efforts to maintain in prison life as state of normality, for prison life to be as ‘normal’ as possible in order to facilitate Nordic prisons’ main objective of preparing prisoners for a return to society. The common phrase used is that Nordic prisons are places of punishment but not places for punishment: the deprivation of liberty is in the fact the punishment whilst the stay in prison should facilitate a prisoner’s betterment or personal growth. Using Norway as a comparator, this article explores the Icelandic approach to prisons to see if it has something fresh to offer.
Read the article here: https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12244
Видео Professor Francis Pakes examines penal exceptionalism in 21st century Iceland канала Howard League
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
Howard Journal of Crime and Justice: Special IssueHoward League Spotlights: Persistence of Victorian PrisonsAlbert DzurHoward League in Conversation with Caroline Adams QPMThe Carlile Inquiry: 10 years onLabour Leadership Hustings - question2A summary of Howard League meeting at UN Congress on Crime Prevention & Criminal Justice Kyoto 2021‘Rushing remand’? Pre-trial detention and bail decision-making in England and WalesParmoor Lecture 2016Frances Crook - Take Action pledgeHoward League PCC Election FilmLife OutsideSentencing Young AdultsSPOTLIGHTS: The IPP SentenceCaptive Christmas: Unwrapping the third spaceParmoor lecture 2017Crime and Photography: Using photovoice methodology as a route to desistanceCreating a new penal reform agenda webinarProfessor Fergus McNeill speaking at the Howard League Community Awards 2020Spotlights: King's Speech special