Why New Aircraft Engine Ideas Rarely Succeed
Aircraft owners and pilots often bemoan the lack of new technology in aircraft engines and complain--accurately--that most airplane engines are basically 1960s tech. But as Paul Bertorelli points out in this video, it's not for lack of trying. And it's not necessarily the new engine itself that fails to get traction, but the company's support--or lack thereof.
CORRECTION: The Rotax V-6 engine had single, not dual overhead camshafts.
Видео Why New Aircraft Engine Ideas Rarely Succeed канала AVweb
CORRECTION: The Rotax V-6 engine had single, not dual overhead camshafts.
Видео Why New Aircraft Engine Ideas Rarely Succeed канала AVweb
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
Why Aircraft Engines QuitHow This Illustration Fueled My Obsession With the Bell X-1How A Split Second Wrong Decision Caused the Kobe Bryant Fatal CrashAre Planes With Parachutes Really Safer?Landing at the only airport that's also a public beachWhy Cheapskate Pilots Don't Like 406 ELTsWhy Light Sport Airplanes Suffer So Many CrashesEven a Numbskull Like Me Can Learn to Fly a Gyroplane20 Seconds to Save It: How an Impulsive Pilot Caused a Fatal Crash RevisedHow to Avoid Five Deadly Takeoff Mistakes150HP Honda HRV Aircraft Engine! Viking Aircraft EnginesFlying the World's Fastest Piston Single-Mooney Acclaim UltraSee Thru Liquid Piston Rotary Engine - In Slow MotionWhen Pilots BREAK the rules | Royal Air Maroc Express 439Boeing 747 Gear Up Landing | Viral Debrief7 STRANGEST New Aerospace ENGINESThe Story of the Diamond Aircraft DA62Emergency Landing: Beach or Breakers?WWII PISTON AIRCRAFT ENGINE TYPES, MECHANISM & OILING SYSTEMS TRAINING FILM 59294USAF Captain Ken Curry B-52 Pilot - SA-2 Story from Vietnam War