Why I chose SharkByte over DJI for long range (range test)

In this video I discuss my logic for choosing Sharkbyte over DJI.
Summarized points:
Shark byte is better than DJI for downed aircraft recovery. If DJI loses signal, it stops recording. Also it cannot record coordinates from OSD. So if you lose comms with your quad, it will be very difficult to find it.
Cons to Sharkbyte:
OSD is still work in progress. It works with a lot of glitches.
I think it is causing some issues for the GPS.
Sharkbyte is a pain in the ass to install, compared to analog.
Pros:
I think the range is excellent. The Divimath chip is capable of 24+km without a secondary LNA. For an FCC Part 15 device, it is incredible. Manufacturer claims that it is capable of -98dB sensitivity.
The unit is lighter and smaller than DJI. Has smaller radiators.
Video quality is pretty good. A lot of folks who reviewed Sharkbyte say that video is basically analog. Almost all of them tested the unit on budget goggles. On my HDO2 Sharkbyte looks magnificent. (Still not DJI, though)

Timecodes:
0:00 - Intro
0:28 - Why do you want HD?
1:22 - Advantages of DJI
2:22 - Advantages of Sharkbyte
6:58 - Goggles setup
7:55 - Quad setup
10:13 - Sharkbyte Range test
12:52 - Summary

Видео Why I chose SharkByte over DJI for long range (range test) канала Q-RapidPrototyping