Can we trust peer-reviewed papers?
TO SUPPORT THIS CHANNEL please support my favorite charity:
https://healthinharmony.org/donate/
1:30 Graph of retracted papers from
http://blogs.nature.com/news/2011/10/the_reasons_for_retraction.html
1:43 - http://blogs.nature.com/news/page/156?WT_ec_id=NEWS-20110405
1:41 Ocorrafoo Cobange story:
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/60.full
3:19
http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2014/11/24/bogus_academic_journal_accepts_paper_that_reads_get_me_off_your_fucking.html
6:20 – “Expelled, No Intelligence Allowed” with Ben Stein
9:30 -- Steven Meyer paper:
http://www.discovery.org/a/2177
10:32 -- Amicus brief
https://www.discovery.org/f/647
13:42 – See also: “House Finds Persecution of Darwin Doubters”
http://kolbecenter.org/house-finds-persecution-of-darwin-doubters/
11:38 -- Willie Soon financing:
http://www.nature.com/news/documents-spur-investigation-of-climate-sceptic-1.16972
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/us/ties-to-corporate-cash-for-climate-change-researcher-Wei-Hock-Soon.html
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/feb/21/climate-change-denier-willie-soon-funded-energy-industry
http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2003/9/12/warming-study-draws-fire-a-study/
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/05/science/politics-reasserts-itself-in-the-debate-over-climate-change-and-its-hazards.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm
15:19 CORRECTION: I said “papers that conform to what we already know.” I should have said: “repeat what we already know.”
18:00 -- http://www.nature.com/news/publishers-withdraw-more-than-120-gibberish-papers-1.14763#/b1
22:13 -- https://thsresearch.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/ef-gast-data-research-report-062717.pdf
If you just google "Master Journals List" it will come up with the website -- http://mjl.clarivate.com/
I think Journal Citation Reports is subscriptions only, but it should be available in your local university library or any good library. I have an electronic copy but I can't remember where I got it from. However, you can find the impact factors of individual journals by googling the title of the journal and writing "impact factor" -- I think even Wikipedia has them. But it won't tell you if the journal is science or social science, and that's a huge difference.
Видео Can we trust peer-reviewed papers? канала potholer54
https://healthinharmony.org/donate/
1:30 Graph of retracted papers from
http://blogs.nature.com/news/2011/10/the_reasons_for_retraction.html
1:43 - http://blogs.nature.com/news/page/156?WT_ec_id=NEWS-20110405
1:41 Ocorrafoo Cobange story:
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/60.full
3:19
http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2014/11/24/bogus_academic_journal_accepts_paper_that_reads_get_me_off_your_fucking.html
6:20 – “Expelled, No Intelligence Allowed” with Ben Stein
9:30 -- Steven Meyer paper:
http://www.discovery.org/a/2177
10:32 -- Amicus brief
https://www.discovery.org/f/647
13:42 – See also: “House Finds Persecution of Darwin Doubters”
http://kolbecenter.org/house-finds-persecution-of-darwin-doubters/
11:38 -- Willie Soon financing:
http://www.nature.com/news/documents-spur-investigation-of-climate-sceptic-1.16972
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/us/ties-to-corporate-cash-for-climate-change-researcher-Wei-Hock-Soon.html
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/feb/21/climate-change-denier-willie-soon-funded-energy-industry
http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2003/9/12/warming-study-draws-fire-a-study/
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/05/science/politics-reasserts-itself-in-the-debate-over-climate-change-and-its-hazards.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm
15:19 CORRECTION: I said “papers that conform to what we already know.” I should have said: “repeat what we already know.”
18:00 -- http://www.nature.com/news/publishers-withdraw-more-than-120-gibberish-papers-1.14763#/b1
22:13 -- https://thsresearch.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/ef-gast-data-research-report-062717.pdf
If you just google "Master Journals List" it will come up with the website -- http://mjl.clarivate.com/
I think Journal Citation Reports is subscriptions only, but it should be available in your local university library or any good library. I have an electronic copy but I can't remember where I got it from. However, you can find the impact factors of individual journals by googling the title of the journal and writing "impact factor" -- I think even Wikipedia has them. But it won't tell you if the journal is science or social science, and that's a huge difference.
Видео Can we trust peer-reviewed papers? канала potholer54
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
Retractions, Post-Publication Peer Review, and Fraud: Scientific Publishing's Wild West'Creationism: Still Crazy After All These Years' - Eugenie Scott, AAI 2009Are we headed for a Grand Solar Minimum?The Peer Review ProcessThe Real Secret to Fighting Peer PressureOK Go - Needing/Getting - Official Video6 dumbest ideas politicians have about scienceResponse to Bill Whittle's "Is climate change real?"Whatever happened to GLOBAL COOLING?Peer Review in 3 MinutesThe story of the Earth in 33 minutesUpgrading a Cheap Microscope Lets You See Rainbows! - Polarized Light ModPotholer and Hovind Come Together (Not like that!)Being an atheist doesn't necessarily mean you're rationalHow accurate are scientific predictions about climate?The Problem With Peer Review - Eric Weinstein | The Portal Podcast ClipsAre electric cars really green? An investigation of Bjorn Lomborg's claims.The experts explain the global warming myth: Willie SoonEvolution and Global Warming Denialism: How the Public is MisledIs America an imperialist, white-supremacist, capitalist patriarchy? | FACTUAL FEMINIST