Why do calculators get this wrong? (We don't know!)
Women in Trading and Technology: https://www.janestreet.com/witt.html
21 to 23 September 2020 (deadline to apply: Friday 7 August 2020)
These are all of the almost-π calculations I showed:
11^6 ÷ 13 ≈ (156158413/3600)π
17^5 ÷ 11 ≈ (366494029/8920)π
11^6 ÷ 17 ≈ (119415257/3600)π
19^9 ÷ 2^3 ≈ (65249503235207/5082)π
5^9 ÷ 3 ≈ (1226819353/5920)π
7^9 ÷ 19 ≈ (2623750469/3881)π
13^5 ÷ 7 ≈ (154266801/9137)π
21^6 ÷ 5 ≈ (27818908094/5095)π
23^9 ÷ 5^4 ≈ (4030701961529/4394)π
Sheena's tweet
https://mobile.twitter.com/Sheena2907/status/1129114614321618951
The reddit post
https://www.reddit.com/r/CasualMath/comments/bn0k9f/got_this_while_doing_some_calculations_why_does/
Farey sequence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farey_sequence
This is the 'best rational approximation' algorithm I used:
https://www.johndcook.com/blog/2010/10/20/best-rational-approximation/
I've tested it on the Casio FX-83GT PLUS and Casio FX-991EX CLASSWIZ. Let me know what calculators you have checked!
CORRECTIONS:
- At 8:30 I say "13" when I mean "11". Ignore what I say: the on-screen number is correct!
- Let me know if you spot anything else.
Thanks to my Patreon supports who do support these videos and make them possible. Here is a random subset:
Alan Flett
Nikola Studer
Philippe von Bergen
Alan McNea
Derek Chandler
Jeremy Buchanan
Alan H.
Malcolm Rowe
Glenn Watson
Patrick Stover
Support my channel and I can make more videos:
https://www.patreon.com/standupmaths
And of course thanks to Jane Street who support my channel. They're amazing.
https://www.janestreet.com/
Filming and editing by Matt Parker
Additional camera work by Lucie Green
That piano music is No.8 Requiem by Esther Abrami
All other music by Howard Carter
Design by Simon Wright and Adam Robinson
MATT PARKER: Stand-up Mathematician
Website: http://standupmaths.com/
US book: https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/610964/humble-pi-by-matt-parker/
UK book: https://mathsgear.co.uk/products/5b9fa76f230ffa140094dc43
Nerdy maths toys: http://mathsgear.co.uk/
A transcendental number is not the root of any integer polynomial!
https://mathworld.wolfram.com/TranscendentalNumber.html
Видео Why do calculators get this wrong? (We don't know!) канала Stand-up Maths
21 to 23 September 2020 (deadline to apply: Friday 7 August 2020)
These are all of the almost-π calculations I showed:
11^6 ÷ 13 ≈ (156158413/3600)π
17^5 ÷ 11 ≈ (366494029/8920)π
11^6 ÷ 17 ≈ (119415257/3600)π
19^9 ÷ 2^3 ≈ (65249503235207/5082)π
5^9 ÷ 3 ≈ (1226819353/5920)π
7^9 ÷ 19 ≈ (2623750469/3881)π
13^5 ÷ 7 ≈ (154266801/9137)π
21^6 ÷ 5 ≈ (27818908094/5095)π
23^9 ÷ 5^4 ≈ (4030701961529/4394)π
Sheena's tweet
https://mobile.twitter.com/Sheena2907/status/1129114614321618951
The reddit post
https://www.reddit.com/r/CasualMath/comments/bn0k9f/got_this_while_doing_some_calculations_why_does/
Farey sequence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farey_sequence
This is the 'best rational approximation' algorithm I used:
https://www.johndcook.com/blog/2010/10/20/best-rational-approximation/
I've tested it on the Casio FX-83GT PLUS and Casio FX-991EX CLASSWIZ. Let me know what calculators you have checked!
CORRECTIONS:
- At 8:30 I say "13" when I mean "11". Ignore what I say: the on-screen number is correct!
- Let me know if you spot anything else.
Thanks to my Patreon supports who do support these videos and make them possible. Here is a random subset:
Alan Flett
Nikola Studer
Philippe von Bergen
Alan McNea
Derek Chandler
Jeremy Buchanan
Alan H.
Malcolm Rowe
Glenn Watson
Patrick Stover
Support my channel and I can make more videos:
https://www.patreon.com/standupmaths
And of course thanks to Jane Street who support my channel. They're amazing.
https://www.janestreet.com/
Filming and editing by Matt Parker
Additional camera work by Lucie Green
That piano music is No.8 Requiem by Esther Abrami
All other music by Howard Carter
Design by Simon Wright and Adam Robinson
MATT PARKER: Stand-up Mathematician
Website: http://standupmaths.com/
US book: https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/610964/humble-pi-by-matt-parker/
UK book: https://mathsgear.co.uk/products/5b9fa76f230ffa140094dc43
Nerdy maths toys: http://mathsgear.co.uk/
A transcendental number is not the root of any integer polynomial!
https://mathworld.wolfram.com/TranscendentalNumber.html
Видео Why do calculators get this wrong? (We don't know!) канала Stand-up Maths
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
How lucky is too lucky?: The Minecraft Speedrunning Dream Controversy ExplainedWhy Sugar Always Twists Light To The Right - Optical RotationWhy is there no equation for the perimeter of an ellipse‽General Relativity: Top 05 Mishaps [inc INTERSTELLAR]The Unbeatable Game from the 60s: Dr NIMWhy π^π^π^π could be an integer (for all we know!).Darts in Higher Dimensions (with 3blue1brown) - NumberphileWhat Happens When Maths Goes Wrong? - with Matt ParkerUK Government loses data because of Excel mistake.How did Ramanujan solve the STRAND puzzle?Calculating π with Avogadro's NumberWhy is the Apple Calendar so broken?How does Dobble (Spot It) work?How many 3D nets does a 4D hypercube have?Exploring the mysteries of the Prime (gaps!) Line.Will a falling pencil hit the table? We do the maths!Calculating π by hand the Isaac Newton way: Pi Day 2020Generating π from 1,000 random numbersComplex Fibonacci Numbers?Does "land area" assume a country is perfectly flat?