TOO CLOSE TO CALL: Proximate Cause in Palsgraf | Tort Law
Today, we're looking at Palsgraf v. Long Island R. Co., 248 N.Y. 339 (N.Y. 1928). In this case, Judge Cardozo laid out the concept of proximate cause in negligence cases for torts. In looking to proximate cause, Judge Cardozo generally found there needed to be a reasonable apprehension of a harm. If it was too weird, too unforeseeable, it was a step too far, and there was no proximate cause for purposes of the claim.
Disclaimer: Please be aware, no information provided in this video, or any other on this channel, should ever be taken as legal advice or recommendation. The information is provided for entertainment purposes only. Should you have legal questions or needs, please seek out a local attorney.
Any elements held within this video which are the subject of copyright, whether image, sound, voice, moving picture, or otherwise is used under Fair Use for purposes of education.
The 1842 courthouse of the New York Court of Appeals in Albany, Henry Rector, architect
UpstateNYer - Own work
Held under the CC BY-SA 3.0, no alterations
Видео TOO CLOSE TO CALL: Proximate Cause in Palsgraf | Tort Law канала Sloth Law
Disclaimer: Please be aware, no information provided in this video, or any other on this channel, should ever be taken as legal advice or recommendation. The information is provided for entertainment purposes only. Should you have legal questions or needs, please seek out a local attorney.
Any elements held within this video which are the subject of copyright, whether image, sound, voice, moving picture, or otherwise is used under Fair Use for purposes of education.
The 1842 courthouse of the New York Court of Appeals in Albany, Henry Rector, architect
UpstateNYer - Own work
Held under the CC BY-SA 3.0, no alterations
Видео TOO CLOSE TO CALL: Proximate Cause in Palsgraf | Tort Law канала Sloth Law
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
![MAPP v. OHIO EXPLAINED: The Exclusionary Rule | Criminal Law](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/XMuCDHORPk4/default.jpg)
![Washington v. Davis: Discrimination in Intent or Effect? | Constitutional Law](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/EHXUt32vQKQ/default.jpg)
![Search Incident to a Lawful Arrest: Chimel v. California | Criminal Law](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/qMu6x1T542Q/default.jpg)
![PUNISHED AFTER THE FACT: EX POST FACTO | Constitutional Law](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/vWXytcGSWW0/default.jpg)
![North Carolina v. Alford: A (kinda) Guilty Plea and Free Choice | Criminal Law](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/jYLZgWgk80I/default.jpg)
![Defamation Per Se and a Wheelbarrow: MacDonald v. Riggs | Tort Law](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OzXe0hjRjWs/default.jpg)
![MAKING ILLEGAL CONTRACEPTION LEGAL: Griswold v. Connecticut | Constitutional Law Case](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/RGAjT6dC1yA/default.jpg)
![Anti-Asian Hatred: Korematsu v. U.S. | Constitutional Law (War Powers)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/TFQoT8k2V4s/default.jpg)
![Abrams v. U.S.: Sedition, Intent, and First Amendment | Criminal Law](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/hVqJ06GDp0k/default.jpg)
![SEPARATE BUT EQUAL: Plessy v. Ferguson | Constitutional Law](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/YSeuN9bqeyc/default.jpg)
![The Government Made Me Do It: Jacobson v. United States | Criminal Law](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/uuZx3mevkuI/default.jpg)
![5 THINGS TO CONSIDER IF YOU'RE THINKING ABOUT GOING TO LAW SCHOOL | Law School](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/BYlubel4xv4/default.jpg)
![A WOMAN'S RIGHT TO CHOOSE: Roe v. Wade and the National Access to Abortion | Constitutional Law](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/zXUI7d4DAnk/default.jpg)
![WHEN MURDER ISN'T MURDER -The Year and a Day Rule | Criminal Case](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/uPRKghbUUMk/default.jpg)
![YOUR WHEAT LOWERS MY WHEAT PRICES-Commerce Clause, Wickard v. Filburn | Constitutional Case](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/WfoyzMABSHs/default.jpg)
![THE RIGHT TO AN ATTORNEY: Gideon v. Wainwright | Criminal Law Case](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_NN3GEVk_zE/default.jpg)
![Treason and aiding the enemy: Cramer v. United States | Criminal Law](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/0NXH3zDZjJI/default.jpg)
![HOW CORSETS AFFECTED THE LAW: Egbert v. Lippmann | Patent Law](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/eA8i0AwvMXQ/default.jpg)
![Respecting Indian Treaties: Herrera v. Wyoming | Indian Law](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/IFqGsUdb7G4/default.jpg)
![3 THINGS I DID TO PASS THE BAR THE FIRST TIME! | Law School](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/abT_wGaN8y4/default.jpg)