Predator fails sex offender class. To catch a predator 2020

TLDR: TL/DR: Dustin lies about being alone with minors, admits to jerking off to teens, and doesn’t take his sex offender class seriously. He has to face trial and will probably go back to prison for breaking his parole.

Join the discussion: http://templeoftcap.freeforums.net/thread/8319/latest-update-justin-mcphetridges-case
The Papers on his case says:
Local Rule 83.10(b)(8): The defendant shall submit to polygraph testing at his/her expense, as directed by the probation officer, in order to determine if he/she is in compliance with the conditions of supervision, or to facilitate sex offender treatment. The defendant shall be truthful during polygraph evaluations.
Mr. McPhetridge began sex offender treatment at Counseling and Consultation Services, Inc. (CCS) in January 2015. The offender has attended sex offender treatment as required. Mr. McPhetridge has failed to make any measurable progress while participating in sex offender treatment. The offender has failed to make any significant progress in addressing his sexual offense dynamics and his established goals while participating in sex offender treatment.
On or about June 18, 2018, the offender was given a polygraph examination. During the pre-test review, Mr. McPhetridge disclosed no contact with anyone under the age of 18. The offender was asked the following question on the polygraph exam: “Since January 2018, have you been alone with anyone you knew to be under 18 years old?” The offender answered, “NO.” This response was deemed untruthful.

On or about July 19, 2018, Mr. McPhetridge was given a polygraph examination. To both questions, the offender answered, “NO.” The response was deemed untruthful. During the post-test interview, Mr. McPhetridge denied being alone with minors or contacting minors on social media.

On or about January 8, 2019, Mr. McPhetridge was given a polygraph examination. During the pre-test interview, the offender presented his log book of his daily activities.

The offender was asked the following questions on the polygraph exam: “Since July 2018, have you been completely alone with a minor?” and he answered, “NO”; “Since July 2018, have you accessed the Internet?” and he answered, “NO”; and Since July 2018, have you viewed any pornography?” and he answered, “NO.” The response to the viewing pornography question was deemed untruthful.

During the post-test interview, Mr. McPhetridge denied viewing pornography, and he stated he had been fantasizing about women, to include women on television and to having “unnatural” thoughts about his cousin’s girlfriend.

The offender was confronted about his lack of genuine effort in treatment. Mr. McPhetridge made no effort in dealing with his problematic activities. CCS has reported that based on his continued lack of progress in treatment, unwillingness to be open and honest with his treatment group and treatment team regarding treatment issues, and the uncertainty of his behaviors and activities in the community, Mr. McPhetridge has been discharged from sex offender treatment as a treatment failure.

Assessment of Flight/Danger and Bond Recommendation: Based on the above information, it appears the offender has failed to comply with the rules and conditions of sex offender treatment, failed to participate fully and honestly in sex offender treatment, failed to follow the instructions of the probation officer, and failed to comply with polygraph testing. This officer does not consider the offender to be a risk of flight. Based on the offender’s previous criminal conduct, to include traveling to another state to engage in illicit sexual conduct with a 13-year-old female, possession of child pornography, and his refusal to cooperate, participate, and comply with the rules and restrictions of sex offender treatment, this officer does consider the offender a danger to the community. The offender acknowledged only that he was masturbating to fantasies of late teen females that are possibly 17 years of age. Despite insistence of his group and the treatment team that he take full ownership and responsibility (e.g. a 38-year-old man masturbating to fantasies of minors), the offender defended his actions, stating they are most likely 18 and seeing no harm. Although he denied having given into the thoughts and urges, Mr. McPhetridge acknowledged increased struggle with thoughts of using pornography. The offender denied any engagement in any other behaviors that were even potentially problematic. Despite being reminded of his tenuous position with both treatment and probation, Mr. McPhetridge provided no further disclosure or insight to explain his lack of genuine effort in treatment or for his three failed polygraph examinations. Therefore, this officer respectfully recommends the offender be detained pending his revocation hearing.

That a summons be issued and the defendant be ordered to appear in Court for a hearing to determine whether the term of supervision should be revoked.

Видео Predator fails sex offender class. To catch a predator 2020 канала The Cappening Channel