Загрузка...

This AI Agent Tests Apps Like a Real QA Engineer - DeepAgent Review

🤖🧪 DeepAgent: https://deepagent.abacus.ai
⚡️ ChatLLM: https://chatllm.abacus.ai/skn

This AI Agent Tests Apps Like a Real QA Engineer — DeepAgent Review
Most software doesn’t fail because the idea was bad. It fails because small issues slip through unnoticed — broken flows, edge cases nobody tested, regressions that show up after a release. And in practice, QA is often the first thing teams rush or skip, especially when time or budget is tight.

That’s why I wanted to look at DeepAgent from a QA engineer’s perspective. Not as a demo toy, and not as a replacement for people — but as a system that claims it can take a live application, understand how it actually works, and test it the way a human would.

In this video, I give DeepAgent a real app pulled from GitHub and deployed live. I don’t tell it what to test or where to click. I simply provide the link and ask for a full end-to-end QA pass — exploration → test design → execution → evidence → reporting.

The real question isn’t whether it can generate test cases. The question is whether the output is something a real team could trust and act on. Enough talk — let’s see DeepAgent in action. Let’s Dive Deep.

Timestamps:
00:00 Intro – Why QA Gets Skipped (and why apps fail)
01:27 Switching to DeepAgent + the QA prompt
02:07 First Walkthrough – Exploration like a human QA first pass
02:46 Test Plan – Turning real usage into structured coverage (11 test cases)
03:22 Execution – Running the full plan end-to-end + capturing evidence
03:53 Report Review – PDF + HTML output, pass/fail tables, screenshots
04:55 Bugs Found – Severity, impact, and reproducible issues
05:16 Automating QA – Scheduling repeat runs with Tasks
05:41 Final Take – Can teams trust this output?

Features Covered:

* Live app exploration (real user flow discovery, not assumptions)
* Structured QA test plan generation (11 test cases)
* End-to-end execution on a deployed application
* Screenshot evidence + clear pass/fail breakdown
* Bug reporting with severity + impact
* Professional deliverables: PDF + HTML report
* Scheduled QA runs (continuous testing over time)

Key Takeaways:

* DeepAgent doesn’t just “write test cases” — it behaves like a QA engineer running a full cycle
* Exploration-first makes the plan feel grounded in real flows (not generic checklists)
* The report is actionable: each bug ties back to a test case with evidence
* Automating + scheduling is the real unlock — QA becomes ongoing, not a one-time scramble
* Even when most flows pass, the value is catching the few issues that would ship quietly

Built For:

* Solo founders shipping fast who don’t have dedicated QA
* Small teams where testing gets rushed before release
* “Vibe-coding” builders who need guardrails as the product evolves
* Anyone who wants continuous QA without spinning up a full test team

Links:
🤖🧪 DeepAgent: https://deepagent.abacus.ai
⚡️ ChatLLM: https://chatllm.abacus.ai/skn
📫 Contact: https://sharknumbers.com

#DeepAgent #AbacusAI #ChatLLM #QA #SoftwareTesting #AIAgents #AITools #VibeCoding #SharkNumbers #TechReview

Видео This AI Agent Tests Apps Like a Real QA Engineer - DeepAgent Review канала Shark Numbers
Яндекс.Метрика
Все заметки Новая заметка Страницу в заметки
Страницу в закладки Мои закладки
На информационно-развлекательном портале SALDA.WS применяются cookie-файлы. Нажимая кнопку Принять, вы подтверждаете свое согласие на их использование.
О CookiesНапомнить позжеПринять