- Популярные видео
- Авто
- Видео-блоги
- ДТП, аварии
- Для маленьких
- Еда, напитки
- Животные
- Закон и право
- Знаменитости
- Игры
- Искусство
- Комедии
- Красота, мода
- Кулинария, рецепты
- Люди
- Мото
- Музыка
- Мультфильмы
- Наука, технологии
- Новости
- Образование
- Политика
- Праздники
- Приколы
- Природа
- Происшествия
- Путешествия
- Развлечения
- Ржач
- Семья
- Сериалы
- Спорт
- Стиль жизни
- ТВ передачи
- Танцы
- Технологии
- Товары
- Ужасы
- Фильмы
- Шоу-бизнес
- Юмор
This AI Agent Tests Apps Like a Real QA Engineer - DeepAgent Review
🤖🧪 DeepAgent: https://deepagent.abacus.ai
⚡️ ChatLLM: https://chatllm.abacus.ai/skn
This AI Agent Tests Apps Like a Real QA Engineer — DeepAgent Review
Most software doesn’t fail because the idea was bad. It fails because small issues slip through unnoticed — broken flows, edge cases nobody tested, regressions that show up after a release. And in practice, QA is often the first thing teams rush or skip, especially when time or budget is tight.
That’s why I wanted to look at DeepAgent from a QA engineer’s perspective. Not as a demo toy, and not as a replacement for people — but as a system that claims it can take a live application, understand how it actually works, and test it the way a human would.
In this video, I give DeepAgent a real app pulled from GitHub and deployed live. I don’t tell it what to test or where to click. I simply provide the link and ask for a full end-to-end QA pass — exploration → test design → execution → evidence → reporting.
The real question isn’t whether it can generate test cases. The question is whether the output is something a real team could trust and act on. Enough talk — let’s see DeepAgent in action. Let’s Dive Deep.
Timestamps:
00:00 Intro – Why QA Gets Skipped (and why apps fail)
01:27 Switching to DeepAgent + the QA prompt
02:07 First Walkthrough – Exploration like a human QA first pass
02:46 Test Plan – Turning real usage into structured coverage (11 test cases)
03:22 Execution – Running the full plan end-to-end + capturing evidence
03:53 Report Review – PDF + HTML output, pass/fail tables, screenshots
04:55 Bugs Found – Severity, impact, and reproducible issues
05:16 Automating QA – Scheduling repeat runs with Tasks
05:41 Final Take – Can teams trust this output?
Features Covered:
* Live app exploration (real user flow discovery, not assumptions)
* Structured QA test plan generation (11 test cases)
* End-to-end execution on a deployed application
* Screenshot evidence + clear pass/fail breakdown
* Bug reporting with severity + impact
* Professional deliverables: PDF + HTML report
* Scheduled QA runs (continuous testing over time)
Key Takeaways:
* DeepAgent doesn’t just “write test cases” — it behaves like a QA engineer running a full cycle
* Exploration-first makes the plan feel grounded in real flows (not generic checklists)
* The report is actionable: each bug ties back to a test case with evidence
* Automating + scheduling is the real unlock — QA becomes ongoing, not a one-time scramble
* Even when most flows pass, the value is catching the few issues that would ship quietly
Built For:
* Solo founders shipping fast who don’t have dedicated QA
* Small teams where testing gets rushed before release
* “Vibe-coding” builders who need guardrails as the product evolves
* Anyone who wants continuous QA without spinning up a full test team
Links:
🤖🧪 DeepAgent: https://deepagent.abacus.ai
⚡️ ChatLLM: https://chatllm.abacus.ai/skn
📫 Contact: https://sharknumbers.com
#DeepAgent #AbacusAI #ChatLLM #QA #SoftwareTesting #AIAgents #AITools #VibeCoding #SharkNumbers #TechReview
Видео This AI Agent Tests Apps Like a Real QA Engineer - DeepAgent Review канала Shark Numbers
⚡️ ChatLLM: https://chatllm.abacus.ai/skn
This AI Agent Tests Apps Like a Real QA Engineer — DeepAgent Review
Most software doesn’t fail because the idea was bad. It fails because small issues slip through unnoticed — broken flows, edge cases nobody tested, regressions that show up after a release. And in practice, QA is often the first thing teams rush or skip, especially when time or budget is tight.
That’s why I wanted to look at DeepAgent from a QA engineer’s perspective. Not as a demo toy, and not as a replacement for people — but as a system that claims it can take a live application, understand how it actually works, and test it the way a human would.
In this video, I give DeepAgent a real app pulled from GitHub and deployed live. I don’t tell it what to test or where to click. I simply provide the link and ask for a full end-to-end QA pass — exploration → test design → execution → evidence → reporting.
The real question isn’t whether it can generate test cases. The question is whether the output is something a real team could trust and act on. Enough talk — let’s see DeepAgent in action. Let’s Dive Deep.
Timestamps:
00:00 Intro – Why QA Gets Skipped (and why apps fail)
01:27 Switching to DeepAgent + the QA prompt
02:07 First Walkthrough – Exploration like a human QA first pass
02:46 Test Plan – Turning real usage into structured coverage (11 test cases)
03:22 Execution – Running the full plan end-to-end + capturing evidence
03:53 Report Review – PDF + HTML output, pass/fail tables, screenshots
04:55 Bugs Found – Severity, impact, and reproducible issues
05:16 Automating QA – Scheduling repeat runs with Tasks
05:41 Final Take – Can teams trust this output?
Features Covered:
* Live app exploration (real user flow discovery, not assumptions)
* Structured QA test plan generation (11 test cases)
* End-to-end execution on a deployed application
* Screenshot evidence + clear pass/fail breakdown
* Bug reporting with severity + impact
* Professional deliverables: PDF + HTML report
* Scheduled QA runs (continuous testing over time)
Key Takeaways:
* DeepAgent doesn’t just “write test cases” — it behaves like a QA engineer running a full cycle
* Exploration-first makes the plan feel grounded in real flows (not generic checklists)
* The report is actionable: each bug ties back to a test case with evidence
* Automating + scheduling is the real unlock — QA becomes ongoing, not a one-time scramble
* Even when most flows pass, the value is catching the few issues that would ship quietly
Built For:
* Solo founders shipping fast who don’t have dedicated QA
* Small teams where testing gets rushed before release
* “Vibe-coding” builders who need guardrails as the product evolves
* Anyone who wants continuous QA without spinning up a full test team
Links:
🤖🧪 DeepAgent: https://deepagent.abacus.ai
⚡️ ChatLLM: https://chatllm.abacus.ai/skn
📫 Contact: https://sharknumbers.com
#DeepAgent #AbacusAI #ChatLLM #QA #SoftwareTesting #AIAgents #AITools #VibeCoding #SharkNumbers #TechReview
Видео This AI Agent Tests Apps Like a Real QA Engineer - DeepAgent Review канала Shark Numbers
DeepAgent Abacus AI ChatLLM AI agent AI testing QA engineer quality assurance software testing automated testing end-to-end testing E2E tests regression testing bug report test plan test cases app testing web app testing UI testing functional testing user flow testing acceptance testing AI QA agentic QA AI automation AI dev tools test automation bug tracking QA report screenshot evidence continuous testing release testing vibe coding
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
28 января 2026 г. 7:50:38
00:07:40
Другие видео канала





















