Steve G. Lofts - Miki Kiyoshi and Cassirer: The Logic of the Imagination and the Critique of Culture
ENOJP4 Hildesheim 2018
Panel 12: Miki Kiyoshi and Cassirer/Ricœur
Miki Kiyoshi and Ernst Cassirer: The Logic of the Imagination and the Critique of Culture
Setev G. Lofts (King‘s University College, Canada)
Abstract: In his Logic of the Imagination, Miki Kiyoshi states: “We can say that the logic of imagination is the logic of symbols (shōchō 象徴 ). What Cassirer refers to as ‘the philosophy of symbolic forms’ needs to be rewritten in accordance with the logic of the imagination.” Beginning for this quote, this paper will explore a number of parallels in the thought of Miki and Cassirer in order to speculate on what this “rewriting” might in tale. For both it is in and through the imagination as the fluid creative production of images and forms that the human being spins their socio-cultural life-worlds out of themselves and themselves into their socio-cultural life-worlds. The paper will examine how both understand the fluid logic of the imagination as the logic of images and forms; the role of the productive imagination as the ground of radical creativity and by extension that of all human as well as natural existence; and the parallel between Miki’s concept of the imagination as the “formless” source of creation and Cassirer’s concept of “sheer possibility.” For both, the logic of the imagination (symbolic) is a logic of historical forms: the paper will thus also explore the relation between myth, the pathos of a people, history, and the production of images of the future by the productive imagination. It is here that we find the theme of “transition” or Übergang most clearly articulated. Cassirer, in particular, takes up the idea from Hegel. Mythical consciousness is constantly involved in the performance of transitions in which oppositions transition into to their opposites to form an identity: a merging of being into magical-mythical action, as well as the immediate repercussion of this action on being that occurs in both the subjective as well as the objective sense: a μετάβασις εἰς ἄλλο γένος—a transition to a new form of reflection. For Miki and Cassirer, there is originally no separation between the real and the ideal, between the domain of “existence” and that of “signification.” The transition (Übergang) between the two domains is continuously at play, not only in the representing and believing but in the doing of the human. This fluidity of being is the logic of the imagination at work. Finally, the paper will consider their respective critiques of the mythologization of the Modern State as forms of fascist totalizing of a world that attempt to subvert the fluid creative character of the imagination—what Cassirer calls in The Myth of the State a “technique of myth”—and the importance of what they say for our own historical situation.
This talk took place at the fourth annual conference of the European Network of Japanese Philosophy [ENOJP], 5 – 8 September 2018, Universität Hildesheim, Kulturcampus Domäne Marienburg, Germany.
More informations:
http://enojp.org/
http://chisokudopublications.blogspot.com/
https://enojp4.wordpress.com/
Art Direction: Robin Alberding & Jerome Ebeling (CC-BY 3.0)
Видео Steve G. Lofts - Miki Kiyoshi and Cassirer: The Logic of the Imagination and the Critique of Culture канала European Network of Japanese Philosophy
Panel 12: Miki Kiyoshi and Cassirer/Ricœur
Miki Kiyoshi and Ernst Cassirer: The Logic of the Imagination and the Critique of Culture
Setev G. Lofts (King‘s University College, Canada)
Abstract: In his Logic of the Imagination, Miki Kiyoshi states: “We can say that the logic of imagination is the logic of symbols (shōchō 象徴 ). What Cassirer refers to as ‘the philosophy of symbolic forms’ needs to be rewritten in accordance with the logic of the imagination.” Beginning for this quote, this paper will explore a number of parallels in the thought of Miki and Cassirer in order to speculate on what this “rewriting” might in tale. For both it is in and through the imagination as the fluid creative production of images and forms that the human being spins their socio-cultural life-worlds out of themselves and themselves into their socio-cultural life-worlds. The paper will examine how both understand the fluid logic of the imagination as the logic of images and forms; the role of the productive imagination as the ground of radical creativity and by extension that of all human as well as natural existence; and the parallel between Miki’s concept of the imagination as the “formless” source of creation and Cassirer’s concept of “sheer possibility.” For both, the logic of the imagination (symbolic) is a logic of historical forms: the paper will thus also explore the relation between myth, the pathos of a people, history, and the production of images of the future by the productive imagination. It is here that we find the theme of “transition” or Übergang most clearly articulated. Cassirer, in particular, takes up the idea from Hegel. Mythical consciousness is constantly involved in the performance of transitions in which oppositions transition into to their opposites to form an identity: a merging of being into magical-mythical action, as well as the immediate repercussion of this action on being that occurs in both the subjective as well as the objective sense: a μετάβασις εἰς ἄλλο γένος—a transition to a new form of reflection. For Miki and Cassirer, there is originally no separation between the real and the ideal, between the domain of “existence” and that of “signification.” The transition (Übergang) between the two domains is continuously at play, not only in the representing and believing but in the doing of the human. This fluidity of being is the logic of the imagination at work. Finally, the paper will consider their respective critiques of the mythologization of the Modern State as forms of fascist totalizing of a world that attempt to subvert the fluid creative character of the imagination—what Cassirer calls in The Myth of the State a “technique of myth”—and the importance of what they say for our own historical situation.
This talk took place at the fourth annual conference of the European Network of Japanese Philosophy [ENOJP], 5 – 8 September 2018, Universität Hildesheim, Kulturcampus Domäne Marienburg, Germany.
More informations:
http://enojp.org/
http://chisokudopublications.blogspot.com/
https://enojp4.wordpress.com/
Art Direction: Robin Alberding & Jerome Ebeling (CC-BY 3.0)
Видео Steve G. Lofts - Miki Kiyoshi and Cassirer: The Logic of the Imagination and the Critique of Culture канала European Network of Japanese Philosophy
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
3 марта 2019 г. 16:00:06
00:51:45
Другие видео канала
![Yoko Arisaka - Transition and the “Eternal Present” (ENOJP4 Hildesheim 2018)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ycpukdczs38/default.jpg)
![Round Table ENOJP Brussels 2016](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/E9tUCuAZ-LU/default.jpg)
![Amanda Sayonara - Panel 5 ENOJP Paris](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/gLtxGWLj6DM/default.jpg)
![Rein Raud – Dōgen and the Beginnings of Japanese as a Philosophical Language](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/RW3Z7FxVkvg/default.jpg)
![CfP for the EJJP the European Journal of Japanese Philosophy](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Uj10iDgcODs/default.jpg)
![Kristýna Vojtíšková - Panel 1 ENOJP Paris](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/J-35pVSRoPk/default.jpg)
![Reki ANDO (安藤歴) – The Anti-Marxist Moment in the 1980s Japanese Left](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/0KhiXZtx5gE/default.jpg)
![Takada Yasunari - The Consequences of Karl Löwith’s Turn to Japan](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ukLIvqPCT3g/default.jpg)
![Piero Ledent - Panel 10 ENOJP Brussels 2016](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/eFAUqVTzvu4/default.jpg)
![Masumi Sunaba Sevrin - Panel 6 ENOJP Paris](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/boflyZn_ePs/default.jpg)
![Masahiro Morioka - Panel 16 ENOJP Paris](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/7fGSep4MDBY/default.jpg)
![David Cseh - Panel 07 ENOJP Brussels 2016](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_Eeb_kVuB64/default.jpg)
![SAKAI Naoki – Area Studies and National Philosophy (Keynote Speech)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/5ho70cqOdWk/default.jpg)
![Dagmar Dotting - Selbst-Bild. Kalligraphie als Ort der formlosen Form innerhalb Nishidas Philosophie](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ztr6JxaR120/default.jpg)
![Paulus Kaufmann - Panel 28 ENOJP Brussels](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/2PJ75I96aoM/default.jpg)
![Tamara Schneider – Transitions after Destruction: Artistic Response to the 2011 Triple Catastrophe](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/rzIA55-CKnE/default.jpg)
![Yuko Ishihara - Panel 5 ENOJP Brussels](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/EcYqDLgyzJ0/default.jpg)
![Katsumori Makoto - Panel 16 ENOJP Paris](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Qoh8USSY5V0/default.jpg)
![Francesca Greco - Panel 4 ENOJP Paris](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/PsQw5jSqNIc/default.jpg)
![Yūho Hisayama - Zur Möglichkeit der transkulturellen Phänomenologievon ki, pneuma und Geist](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/zEYLFF7OvZg/default.jpg)
![Adam Loughnane - Panel 12 ENOJP Paris](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/fRAJn2Q2BZE/default.jpg)