Загрузка страницы

R(on the application of SC, CB and 8 children)(Appellants) v Secretary of State for DWP(Respondents)

UKSC 2019/0135

On appeal from the Court of Appeal Civil Division (England and Wales)

Please be aware of the reporting restrictions in this case:

THE COURT ORDERED that no one shall publish or reveal the names or addresses of the Appellants who are the subject of these proceedings or publish or reveal any information which would be likely to lead to the identification of the Appellants or of any members of their family in connection with these proceedings.

The Welfare Reform and Work Act 2016 imposed a limit of two on the number of children in respect of whom child tax credit (and its replacement, universal credit) is payable. The limit applies, with a few exceptions, to all children born after 6 April 2017, when the new law came into force.

The appellants are members of families affected by this two child limit. SC lives with her three youngest children, for whom she is solely responsible. Her youngest child was born on 11 July 2017 (and therefore after the two child limit took effect). CB has five children, the youngest of whom was born on 19 April 2017 (just after the new legislation came into force).

The High Court dismissed the appellants’ claims, and the Court of Appeal dismissed their appeal. The appellants now appeal to the Supreme Court.


The issue is:

The Supreme Court is asked to decide whether the ‘two child limit’, a provision of primary legislation which restricts payment of amounts of subsistence benefit for children to the first two children in a family, is incompatible with the Appellants’ rights under the European Convention on Human Rights.
The Supreme Court unanimously dismisses the appeal.
More information is available on our website.

Видео R(on the application of SC, CB and 8 children)(Appellants) v Secretary of State for DWP(Respondents) канала UKSupremeCourt
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Введите заголовок:

Введите адрес ссылки:

Введите адрес видео с YouTube:

Зарегистрируйтесь или войдите с
Информация о видео
9 июля 2021 г. 15:23:27
00:10:09
Другие видео канала
Harcus Sinclair LLP and another (Respondents) v Your Lawyers Ltd (Appellant)Harcus Sinclair LLP and another (Respondents) v Your Lawyers Ltd (Appellant)Cavendish Square Holding BV v Makdessi & ParkingEye Limited v BeavisCavendish Square Holding BV v Makdessi & ParkingEye Limited v BeavisTriple Point Technology, Inc (Respondent) v PTT Public Company Ltd (Appellant)Triple Point Technology, Inc (Respondent) v PTT Public Company Ltd (Appellant)Morris-Garner and another (Appellants) v One Step (Support) Ltd (Respondent)Morris-Garner and another (Appellants) v One Step (Support) Ltd (Respondent)R (on the application of A) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)R (on the application of A) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)Burnett or Grant (Respondent) v International Insurance Company of Hanover Ltd (Appellant)(Scotland)Burnett or Grant (Respondent) v International Insurance Company of Hanover Ltd (Appellant)(Scotland)General Dynamics United Kingdom Ltd (Respondent) v State of Libya (Appellant)General Dynamics United Kingdom Ltd (Respondent) v State of Libya (Appellant)Uber BV and others (Appellants) v Aslam and others (Respondents)Uber BV and others (Appellants) v Aslam and others (Respondents)Lord Mance’s Valedictory Remarks – Wednesday 6 June 2018Lord Mance’s Valedictory Remarks – Wednesday 6 June 2018A and B (Appellants) v Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority and another (Respondents)A and B (Appellants) v Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority and another (Respondents)R (on the application of Agyarko & Ikuga) v Secretary of State for the Home DepartmentR (on the application of Agyarko & Ikuga) v Secretary of State for the Home DepartmentIsle of Wight Council (Appellant) v Platt (Respondent)Isle of Wight Council (Appellant) v Platt (Respondent)Juncker vs. Farage: The final battleJuncker vs. Farage: The final battleTinkler (Respondent) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Appellant)Tinkler (Respondent) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Appellant)Khan (Respondent) v Meadows (Appellant)Khan (Respondent) v Meadows (Appellant)“We’re leaving, we don’t need to behave as if we’re a permanent member (of the EU)”“We’re leaving, we don’t need to behave as if we’re a permanent member (of the EU)”Hurstwood Properties (A) Ltd and others (Respondents) v Rossendale Borough Council and anotherHurstwood Properties (A) Ltd and others (Respondents) v Rossendale Borough Council and anotherClaimants 'tricked' out of benefits, says Jobcentre whistleblowerClaimants 'tricked' out of benefits, says Jobcentre whistleblowerR (on the application of AB) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Justice (Respondent)R (on the application of AB) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Justice (Respondent)Secretary of State for Health and others (Appellants) v Servier Laboratories Ltd and othersSecretary of State for Health and others (Appellants) v Servier Laboratories Ltd and others
Яндекс.Метрика