Scholarly vs. Public vs. Pop History | The Diatribe

There are many types of history, and one batch of categories determines what the expected audience will be. Scholarly history only tries to talk to scholars. Pop history is only concerned with being popular. And public is somewhere in between. I hope I am that third category.
------------------------------------------------------------
references:
Paul Andrew Hutton, The Apache Wars: The Hunt for Geronimo, the Apache Kid, and the Captive Boy Who Started the Longest War in American History (New York: Broadway Books, 2017). https://amzn.to/2u9ZV1G

Patricia Nelson Limerick, The Legacy of Conquest: The Unbroken Past of the American West (New York: W. W. Norton, 1987). https://amzn.to/2WEFTcA

Carl L. Becker, “Everyman His Own Historian.” American Historical Review 37, no. 2 (29 December 1931): 221-36. https://www.historians.org/about-aha-and-membership/aha-history-and-archives/presidential-addresses/carl-l-becker
------------------------------------------------------------
SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE VIDEOS:
http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=CynicalCypher88

Support the channel through PATREON:
https://www.patreon.com/CynicalHistorian

LET'S CONNECT:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/cynicalcypher88
Discord: https://discord.gg/Ukthk4U
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Cynical_History
------------------------------------------------------------
Hashtags: #history #PopHistory #PublicHistory

Видео Scholarly vs. Public vs. Pop History | The Diatribe канала The Cynical Historian