Rebase vs Merge: Choosing the Best Method to Include Changes in Git

Understand the differences between `git rebase` and `git merge` to manage Git branches effectively in your projects.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/76199470/ asked by the user 'nick' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/21473368/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/76199637/ provided by the user 'Martin Baulig' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1703377/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Which is recommended git rebase or git merge to include the changes

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/licensing
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Rebase vs Merge: Choosing the Best Method to Include Changes in Git

When working with Git, managing changes across branches can often lead to confusion, especially when deciding between using git rebase or git merge. For developers who find themselves in a position similar to the following scenario, understanding the differences becomes vital.

The Problem

Imagine you've been working on branch A, which was created from branch B, itself derived from the master branch. Over time, your master branch has progressed, and now you want to include those changes into branch A. Historically, you've likely used merging to achieve this. But is that the best practice? Or is it better to rebase your changes on top of the updated master? Let's break down the options.

The Solutions: Rebase vs Merge

1. Using Rebase

Rebasing is often the recommended approach for incorporating changes from one branch to another when you want a clean history.

How Rebase Works

Takes your commits: It takes each commit you made in branch A (over the old master) and re-applies them on top of the latest master branch (new-master).

Changes SHA: After rebasing, your commits will all have new SHA identifiers since they’ve technically been rewritten. However, the number of commits remains the same, and they sit neatly on top of the latest state of the master.

Benefits of Rebase

Cleaner History: Your commit history will appear linear and more comprehensible. It simplifies the visualization of project evolution and makes upstream merging easier later on.

No Merge Commits: The new commits appear as if they were made off the latest master branch.

2. Using Merge

Merging is the other method available to incorporate changes, and it's fundamentally different from rebasing.

How Merge Works

Combines branches: When you perform a merge, a new commit is created on branch A that combines the changes from master with your current work, while all original commits (with their respective SHAs) remain intact.

Adds Merge Commit: This process adds a merge commit that encapsulates the combined changes.

Benefits of Merge

Retains History: Your original commits and their history are preserved, which can be useful for tracking the evolution of features.

Less Complex for Beginners: Because it retains the full history, new developers may find it easier to understand.

When to Choose Which?

Choosing between rebase and merge shouldn't just depend on personal preference; there are implications that can affect your project history.

Choose Rebase when:

You want a linear history.

You are preparing to submit changes upstream or wish to keep a clean commit history.

Choose Merge when:

You want to retain all commits in their original context.

You are working in a team environment where multiple branches converge frequently, and it's important to see how they relate to one another.

Rebasing a Large Number of Commits

If you have made significant changes in branch A and wish to rebase but worry about merge conflicts, consider squashing your commits before executing the rebase. Squashing allows you to group related commits together, simplifying your commit history and potentially reducing conflict complexity.

Conclusion

Understanding when to use git rebase versus git merge can significantly enhance your Git workflows, allowing for better collaboration and code management. By weighing the pros and cons of each method and considering the context of your work, you can choose the best approach that aligns with your project needs.

Whether you prefer a cleaner commit history with rebase or value retaining historical context with merges, being informed is key to effective Git usage.

Видео Rebase vs Merge: Choosing the Best Method to Include Changes in Git канала vlogize