The Supreme Court's 6-3 Ruling Against Racial Gerrymandering

The Justices say the Voting Rights Act requires an inference of "intentional discrimination" before states can be ordered to draw minority-majority districts. Does this "gut" the VRA, as Democrats claim? How many House seats might be affected? And why has Justice Clarence Thomas argued the result might be less racial polarization?

Subscribe to WSJ Opinion: https://bit.ly/3PovNsz

More from WSJ Opinion:
On site: https://www.wsj.com/news/opinion
On Twitter: https://twitter.com/WSJopinion
On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WSJOpinion

#WSJOpinion #WSJ

Видео The Supreme Court's 6-3 Ruling Against Racial Gerrymandering канала Wall Street Journal Opinion