Загрузка страницы

Canon 17-55 f2.8 vs. Sigma 18-35 f1.8 for film- and video shooters | BMPCC6K

Chapters:
(0:00:00) Introduction
(0:00:52) Build quality, features, price
(0:02:09) Sharpness, color, notes
(0:05:44) Focus breathing, flaring
(0:06:54) IS
(0:09:16) Chromatic aberration, distortion
(0:10:17) Real world footage
(0:12:00) Personal opinion

Hi guys,

in the last couple of weeks we did some testing with the Canon 17-55 f2.8 and the Sigma 18-35 f1.8. They are both very nice lenses for sure. The Canon is, in my opinion, unbeatable for it's price point – especially if you buy it used. But see for yourself :)

We recorded everything in BRAW 5:1 and exported a ProRes file for maximum quality. The indoor tests are not scientific by any means, but instead, they intend to give you an idea of how both lenses behave at different focal ranges and apertures. For lighting used an aputure amaran panel at 3200K, as LEDs tend to have way better SSI in tungsten mode.

If you have any questions, let us know in the comments.
Cheers,
Max

Видео Canon 17-55 f2.8 vs. Sigma 18-35 f1.8 for film- and video shooters | BMPCC6K канала szenenschmiede
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Введите заголовок:

Введите адрес ссылки:

Введите адрес видео с YouTube:

Зарегистрируйтесь или войдите с
Информация о видео
8 мая 2021 г. 22:25:54
00:13:16
Яндекс.Метрика