- Популярные видео
- Авто
- Видео-блоги
- ДТП, аварии
- Для маленьких
- Еда, напитки
- Животные
- Закон и право
- Знаменитости
- Игры
- Искусство
- Комедии
- Красота, мода
- Кулинария, рецепты
- Люди
- Мото
- Музыка
- Мультфильмы
- Наука, технологии
- Новости
- Образование
- Политика
- Праздники
- Приколы
- Природа
- Происшествия
- Путешествия
- Развлечения
- Ржач
- Семья
- Сериалы
- Спорт
- Стиль жизни
- ТВ передачи
- Танцы
- Технологии
- Товары
- Ужасы
- Фильмы
- Шоу-бизнес
- Юмор
Business Model Test | Ind AS 109 | Debt Instruments | CA Final FR | Held to Collect vs Trading
Why are you holding this financial instrument?
Are you holding it because you want to receive the contractual cash flows that the instrument will generate? In other words, your intention is not to sell it—you simply want to collect the cash flows as they become due.
There are three possible business models for holding a debt instrument.
First: You hold the instrument only to collect the contractual cash flows. You do not intend to sell it. In simple words, this is similar to a held-to-maturity approach.
Second: No, that's not the case. You hold the instrument both to collect the contractual cash flows and to sell it whenever it makes business sense. If earning the interest is beneficial, you continue holding it. If market conditions are favourable, you may sell it. So, your objective includes both collecting contractual cash flows and selling the instrument.
Third: You hold the instrument only for the purpose of trading. The objective is to earn profits from buying and selling, not from collecting contractual cash flows.
So, these are the three business models under the Business Model Test.
Now notice something important.
In all these business models, the standard repeatedly refers to contractual cash flows.
The term contractual cash flows is relevant only for debt instruments. Debt instruments, such as bonds and loans, contain contractual rights to receive principal and interest.
An equity instrument does not provide contractual cash flows in this sense. Dividends are discretionary and are not contractual obligations.
Therefore, the Business Model Test and the Cash Flow Characteristics Test (SPPI Test) are applicable only to debt instruments.
For equity instruments, these tests are not relevant. Equity instruments follow a separate classification approach under FVTPL and the FVOCI election.
So, everything we have discussed over the last few minutes is purely for debt instruments.
#BusinessModelTest #IndAS109 #FinancialInstruments #DebtInstruments #SPPITest #CAFinal #CAInter #FinancialReporting #AccountingStandards #IndAS #Accounting #CharteredAccountant #CAStudents #CommerceStudents #FinanceEducation #AccountingEducation #ConceptClarity
Видео Business Model Test | Ind AS 109 | Debt Instruments | CA Final FR | Held to Collect vs Trading канала SUDARSHAN AGRAWAL
Are you holding it because you want to receive the contractual cash flows that the instrument will generate? In other words, your intention is not to sell it—you simply want to collect the cash flows as they become due.
There are three possible business models for holding a debt instrument.
First: You hold the instrument only to collect the contractual cash flows. You do not intend to sell it. In simple words, this is similar to a held-to-maturity approach.
Second: No, that's not the case. You hold the instrument both to collect the contractual cash flows and to sell it whenever it makes business sense. If earning the interest is beneficial, you continue holding it. If market conditions are favourable, you may sell it. So, your objective includes both collecting contractual cash flows and selling the instrument.
Third: You hold the instrument only for the purpose of trading. The objective is to earn profits from buying and selling, not from collecting contractual cash flows.
So, these are the three business models under the Business Model Test.
Now notice something important.
In all these business models, the standard repeatedly refers to contractual cash flows.
The term contractual cash flows is relevant only for debt instruments. Debt instruments, such as bonds and loans, contain contractual rights to receive principal and interest.
An equity instrument does not provide contractual cash flows in this sense. Dividends are discretionary and are not contractual obligations.
Therefore, the Business Model Test and the Cash Flow Characteristics Test (SPPI Test) are applicable only to debt instruments.
For equity instruments, these tests are not relevant. Equity instruments follow a separate classification approach under FVTPL and the FVOCI election.
So, everything we have discussed over the last few minutes is purely for debt instruments.
#BusinessModelTest #IndAS109 #FinancialInstruments #DebtInstruments #SPPITest #CAFinal #CAInter #FinancialReporting #AccountingStandards #IndAS #Accounting #CharteredAccountant #CAStudents #CommerceStudents #FinanceEducation #AccountingEducation #ConceptClarity
Видео Business Model Test | Ind AS 109 | Debt Instruments | CA Final FR | Held to Collect vs Trading канала SUDARSHAN AGRAWAL
business model test ind as 109 Ind AS 109 business model test debt instruments financial instruments SPPI test financial asset classification held to collect held to collect and sell trading financial assets CA Final FR CA Final Financial Reporting CA Inter Advanced Accounting accounting standards Ind AS classes financial reporting CA students chartered accountant accounting education commerce students finance IFRS 9 financial assets SAGC
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Вчера, 10:15:08
00:02:57
Другие видео канала
