SHATTERED Impeachment Precedent? Bolton to Testify? Witnesses? - Real Law Review
Mo’ witnesses, Mo’ problems… for the administration.
Call your senator . . . with Ting Mobile! http://legaleagle.ting.com and get $25 towards your first device. THERE IS STILL TIME: Tell these Senators that the President’s impeachment trial MUST include witness testimony and documents. Allow subpoenas! Romney: 202-224-5251, Murkowski: 202-224-6665, McSally: 202-224-2235, Gardner: 202-224-5941, Collins: 202-224-2523, Burr: 202-224-3154, Alexander: 202-224-4944
⚖️⚖️⚖️Interested in LAW SCHOOL? Get my PRELAW COURSE:
https://legaleagle.teachable.com/p/prelaw
©©©©© Need help with COPYRIGHT? I built a course just for you (15% OFF!):
https://www.copyrightcourse.com/yt
★ A Few of My Favorite Things★
🕵️♂️My Custom Suits: https://legaleagle.link/indochino
👔My Ties: https://fave.co/2ImLY9I
📎My Tie Clips/Bars: https://amzn.to/2WIQ6EE
🔲My Pocket Squares: https://amzn.to/2UfsKtL
💈My Hair Product https://amzn.to/2Ui2aQx
📸My Video Camera Setup https://www.amazon.com/shop/legaleagle
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary from the New York Times:
The White House and Senate Republican leaders struggled on Monday to salvage their plans for a quick acquittal of President Trump after a new account by his former national security adviser John R. Bolton corroborated a central piece of the impeachment case against him. The newly disclosed revelations by Mr. Bolton, whose forthcoming book details how Mr. Trump conditioned military aid for Ukraine on the country’s willingness to furnish information on his political rivals, angered key Republicans and reinvigorated a bid to call witnesses. Such a move would prolong the trial and pose new dangers for the president. A handful of Republicans appeared to be moving closer to joining Democrats in a vote to subpoena Mr. Bolton, even as their leaders insisted that doing so would only delay his inevitable acquittal. “I think it’s increasingly likely that other Republicans will join those of us who think we should hear from John Bolton,” Senator Mitt Romney, Republican of Utah, told reporters. He later told Republican colleagues at a closed-door lunch that calling witnesses would be a wise choice politically and substantively, according to people familiar with the discussions. As they opened the second day of their defense, Mr. Trump’s lawyers largely ignored the revelations from Mr. Bolton, reported on Sunday by The New York Times, that bolstered the abuse of power case made by the House Democratic prosecutors. Instead, the White House team is doubling down on a defense that is directly contradicted by the account in Mr. Bolton’s book, due out in March. Mr. Trump’s lawyers told senators that no evidence existed tying the president’s decision to withhold security aid from Ukraine to his insistence on the investigations. They say the investigations were requested out of a concern for corruption in Ukraine.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Welcome to Real Law Review by LegalEagle; a series where I try to tackle the most important legal issues of the day. If you have a suggestion for the next topic leave your comment below.
And if you disagree, be sure to leave your comment in the form of an OBJECTION!
Remember to make your comments Stella-appropriate. Stella is the LegalBeagle and she wields the gavel of justice. DO NOT MESS WITH STELLA.
★More series on LegalEagle★
Real Lawyer Reacts: https://goo.gl/hw9vcE
Laws Broken: https://goo.gl/PJw3vK
Law 101: https://goo.gl/rrzFw3
Real Law Review: https://goo.gl/NHUoqc
All clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
Typical legal disclaimer from a lawyer (occupational hazard): This is not legal advice, nor can I give you legal advice. Sorry! Everything here is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. Also, some of the links in this post may be affiliate links, meaning, at no cost to you, I will earn a small commission if you click through and make a purchase. But if you click, it really helps me make more of these videos!
========================================================
★ Tweet me @legaleagleDJ https://twitter.com/legaleagleDJ
★ More vids on Facebook: ➜ https://www.facebook.com/legaleaglereacts
★ Stella’s Insta: https://www.instagram.com/stellathelegalbeagle
★ For promotional inquiries please reach out here: legaleagle@standard.tv
Видео SHATTERED Impeachment Precedent? Bolton to Testify? Witnesses? - Real Law Review канала LegalEagle
Call your senator . . . with Ting Mobile! http://legaleagle.ting.com and get $25 towards your first device. THERE IS STILL TIME: Tell these Senators that the President’s impeachment trial MUST include witness testimony and documents. Allow subpoenas! Romney: 202-224-5251, Murkowski: 202-224-6665, McSally: 202-224-2235, Gardner: 202-224-5941, Collins: 202-224-2523, Burr: 202-224-3154, Alexander: 202-224-4944
⚖️⚖️⚖️Interested in LAW SCHOOL? Get my PRELAW COURSE:
https://legaleagle.teachable.com/p/prelaw
©©©©© Need help with COPYRIGHT? I built a course just for you (15% OFF!):
https://www.copyrightcourse.com/yt
★ A Few of My Favorite Things★
🕵️♂️My Custom Suits: https://legaleagle.link/indochino
👔My Ties: https://fave.co/2ImLY9I
📎My Tie Clips/Bars: https://amzn.to/2WIQ6EE
🔲My Pocket Squares: https://amzn.to/2UfsKtL
💈My Hair Product https://amzn.to/2Ui2aQx
📸My Video Camera Setup https://www.amazon.com/shop/legaleagle
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary from the New York Times:
The White House and Senate Republican leaders struggled on Monday to salvage their plans for a quick acquittal of President Trump after a new account by his former national security adviser John R. Bolton corroborated a central piece of the impeachment case against him. The newly disclosed revelations by Mr. Bolton, whose forthcoming book details how Mr. Trump conditioned military aid for Ukraine on the country’s willingness to furnish information on his political rivals, angered key Republicans and reinvigorated a bid to call witnesses. Such a move would prolong the trial and pose new dangers for the president. A handful of Republicans appeared to be moving closer to joining Democrats in a vote to subpoena Mr. Bolton, even as their leaders insisted that doing so would only delay his inevitable acquittal. “I think it’s increasingly likely that other Republicans will join those of us who think we should hear from John Bolton,” Senator Mitt Romney, Republican of Utah, told reporters. He later told Republican colleagues at a closed-door lunch that calling witnesses would be a wise choice politically and substantively, according to people familiar with the discussions. As they opened the second day of their defense, Mr. Trump’s lawyers largely ignored the revelations from Mr. Bolton, reported on Sunday by The New York Times, that bolstered the abuse of power case made by the House Democratic prosecutors. Instead, the White House team is doubling down on a defense that is directly contradicted by the account in Mr. Bolton’s book, due out in March. Mr. Trump’s lawyers told senators that no evidence existed tying the president’s decision to withhold security aid from Ukraine to his insistence on the investigations. They say the investigations were requested out of a concern for corruption in Ukraine.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Welcome to Real Law Review by LegalEagle; a series where I try to tackle the most important legal issues of the day. If you have a suggestion for the next topic leave your comment below.
And if you disagree, be sure to leave your comment in the form of an OBJECTION!
Remember to make your comments Stella-appropriate. Stella is the LegalBeagle and she wields the gavel of justice. DO NOT MESS WITH STELLA.
★More series on LegalEagle★
Real Lawyer Reacts: https://goo.gl/hw9vcE
Laws Broken: https://goo.gl/PJw3vK
Law 101: https://goo.gl/rrzFw3
Real Law Review: https://goo.gl/NHUoqc
All clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
Typical legal disclaimer from a lawyer (occupational hazard): This is not legal advice, nor can I give you legal advice. Sorry! Everything here is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. Also, some of the links in this post may be affiliate links, meaning, at no cost to you, I will earn a small commission if you click through and make a purchase. But if you click, it really helps me make more of these videos!
========================================================
★ Tweet me @legaleagleDJ https://twitter.com/legaleagleDJ
★ More vids on Facebook: ➜ https://www.facebook.com/legaleaglereacts
★ Stella’s Insta: https://www.instagram.com/stellathelegalbeagle
★ For promotional inquiries please reach out here: legaleagle@standard.tv
Видео SHATTERED Impeachment Precedent? Bolton to Testify? Witnesses? - Real Law Review канала LegalEagle
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
Bloodbath at the DOJ - Roger Stone Sentenced (Real Law Review)Ahmaud Arbery: A “Citizen’s Arrest” Gone Wrong? (LegalEagle’s Real Law Review)What's The Deal with "Court Packing" The Supreme Court?Hillary Clinton Defames Tulsi Gabbard or SLAPP LOLsuit? - Real Law ReviewImpeached for THAT? (Comparing the Trump Articles of Impeachment - Real Law Review)Troops Deployed Under Posse Comitatus and The Insurrection Act? (LegalEagle’s Law Review)Lawyer Responds: John Oliver SLAPPs Back? (Real Law Review)The Tragedy of Trump’s Second ImpeachmentDid *Certain* Politicians Commit Sedition?The Case Against John Bolton & My Lawsuit Against the White House (LegalEagle's Law Review)A Rhetorical and Legal Analysis of Michael Cohen's Testimony Before Congress (Real Law Review)President Trump Loses the Tax Return Battle | LegalEagle’s Law ReviewLawyer Examines Impeachment Defenses (Real Law Review)Is the NRA Being Sued Out of Existence? | LegalEagle’s Real Law ReviewPlatforms, Publishers, and Presidents ft. HoegLaw (LegalEagle’s Real Law Review)Real Lawyer Reacts To the Trial of the Chicago 7Ukraine Whistleblower, Transcript, Complaint & Impeachment -- Real Law ReviewLawyer Ruins TLC’s 90 Day Fiance - Real Law Review // LegalEaglePortland Occupied by Secret Federal "Police"? | LegalEagle’s Real Law ReviewDid Chevron Imprison Environmental Lawyer Steve Donziger