Understanding the Differences Between PixelShuffle in PyTorch and depth_to_space in TensorFlow

Discover why `PixelShuffle` and `depth_to_space` functions behave differently in PyTorch and TensorFlow when the output channels are greater than one, and learn how to resolve this discrepancy effectively.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/68272502/ asked by the user 'ggobieski' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/420620/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/68321142/ provided by the user 'ggobieski' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/420620/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: TF depth_to_space not same as Torch's PixelShuffle when output channels 1?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/licensing
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Exploring the Discrepancy Between PixelShuffle and depth_to_space

When working with deep learning models, especially when porting them between different frameworks, it’s common to encounter discrepancies in how certain operations are implemented. One such perplexity arises when dealing with the PixelShuffle function in PyTorch compared to depth_to_space in TensorFlow.

This guide aims to shed light on this issue, specifically when the output channels are greater than one, and provide a solution for achieving equivalence between the two operations.

The Problem

While attempting to convert a model trained in PyTorch to TensorFlow, a user discovered that the output of the PixelShuffle operation in PyTorch does not match the output of TensorFlow's depth_to_space operation when configurations include multiple output channels.

Example Code

Here’s a simplified version of the code demonstrating the problem:

In PyTorch:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In TensorFlow:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The Disparity

As observed, the following comparison reveals the outputs:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This suggests significant discrepancies between the two frameworks' implementations.

Analyzing the Differences

The core of the issue stems from how these two libraries interpret or process the PixelShuffle operation versus depth_to_space when handling multiple output channels.

Understanding the Output Channel Permutation

To achieve equivalence, it's important to understand how the operations distribute and rearrange pixel values across channels and dimensions. If your output channels (oc) and shuffling size (s) are configured inappropriately, the outcome will differ.

The Solution

To resolve the discrepancies between the two implementations, you will need to adjust how the channels are shuffled. Specifically, this can be done in two ways:

Shuffle the Channels of One Input:
You can manually shuffle the channels of either the input to the depth_to_space in TensorFlow or modify the weights of the convolution preceding it.

Permuting Weights of Convolution Layer:
If the PixelShuffle or depth_to_space is utilized directly following a convolution operation, one effective workaround is to permute the channels of the convolution's weights in TensorFlow.

For example, use the permutation:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This generates a rearrangement similar to [0, 2, 4, 1, 3, 5], thereby aligning the channels with those of the PyTorch implementation.

Step-by-Step Implementation

Input Preparation:
Ensure your inputs are formatted in the correct notch, with NHWC used for TensorFlow and NCHW for PyTorch.

Modified TensorFlow Setup:
Adjust the convolution weights this way:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Testing Equivalence:
Perform tests after implementing the above changes to ensure that the outputs from both frameworks match.

Conclusion

Understanding the subtle differences between operations in different deep learning frameworks is crucial, especially as we attempt to migrate models from one to another. By effectively permuting the required channels and weights, you can achieve consistency between PyTorch’s PixelShuffle and TensorFlow’s depth_to_space.

With careful adjustment and testing, you'll ensure that your models maintain their performance across different platforms.

Feel free to reach out with any questions or additional challenges you may face when dealing with model conversions!

Видео Understanding the Differences Between PixelShuffle in PyTorch and depth_to_space in TensorFlow канала vlogize