Yael Tauman Kalai @ Theory Lunch
Title: Non-Interactive Publicly Verifiable Delegation with Applications to PPAD Hardness
Abstract: We construct a delegation scheme for delegating polynomial time computations. Our scheme is non-interactive in the common reference string (CRS) model, and publicly verifiable. The soundness of our scheme is based on an (efficiently falsifiable) decisional assumption on groups with bilinear maps. Prior to this work, publicly verifiable non-interactive delegation schemes were only known under non-standard assumptions, such as knowledge assumptions (or in the Random Oracle model), or the existence of obfuscation or multilinear maps.
Our scheme has two desirable features: The proofs are unambiguous, in the sense that it is hard to find two distinct proofs for the same statement, and are updatable in the sense that given a proof for the statement that a Turing machine M transitions from configuration C_0 to C_T in T steps, one can efficiently generate a proof for the statement that M transitions from configuration C_0 to C_{T+1} in T+1 steps.
We show that such a delegation scheme implies PPAD hardness, by following a similar approach to that of Choudhuri et al. (STOC2019), who obtained PPAD hardness based on an assumption related to the soundness of the Fiat-Shamir paradigm.
This is based on two joint works, both with Omer Paneth and Lisa Yang.
Видео Yael Tauman Kalai @ Theory Lunch канала Princeton TCS
Abstract: We construct a delegation scheme for delegating polynomial time computations. Our scheme is non-interactive in the common reference string (CRS) model, and publicly verifiable. The soundness of our scheme is based on an (efficiently falsifiable) decisional assumption on groups with bilinear maps. Prior to this work, publicly verifiable non-interactive delegation schemes were only known under non-standard assumptions, such as knowledge assumptions (or in the Random Oracle model), or the existence of obfuscation or multilinear maps.
Our scheme has two desirable features: The proofs are unambiguous, in the sense that it is hard to find two distinct proofs for the same statement, and are updatable in the sense that given a proof for the statement that a Turing machine M transitions from configuration C_0 to C_T in T steps, one can efficiently generate a proof for the statement that M transitions from configuration C_0 to C_{T+1} in T+1 steps.
We show that such a delegation scheme implies PPAD hardness, by following a similar approach to that of Choudhuri et al. (STOC2019), who obtained PPAD hardness based on an assumption related to the soundness of the Fiat-Shamir paradigm.
This is based on two joint works, both with Omer Paneth and Lisa Yang.
Видео Yael Tauman Kalai @ Theory Lunch канала Princeton TCS
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
Scott Aaronson @ Theory LunchTim Roughgarden @ Theory LunchTuring MachinesQuantum supremacy: Benchmarking the Sycamore processor (QuantumCasts)The 7 steps of machine learningShubhangi Saraf @ Theory LunchRyan Williams @ Theory LunchRyan O'Donnell @ Theory LunchThe first 20 hours -- how to learn anything | Josh Kaufman | TEDxCSUPRESENTING AND PUBLIC SPEAKING TIPS - HOW TO IMPROVE SKILLS & CONFIDENCE1. Introduction to Human Behavioral BiologyDavid Zuckerman @ Theory LunchDelegating Computation I"Tying Knots in Quantum Computing," Charles Marcus, Center for Quantum Devices, Niels Bohr InstituteHow to learn any language in six months | Chris Lonsdale | TEDxLingnanUniversityA Short Introduction to Entropy, Cross-Entropy and KL-DivergenceComputing a theory of everything | Stephen WolframP vs. NP and the Computational Complexity ZooWarp Drive and Aliens: Bryan Gaensler Public LectureFeynman's Lost Lecture (ft. 3Blue1Brown)