Understanding PySpark Query Performance: Join vs When

Discover how to optimize `PySpark` queries by exploring the performance differences between using joins and when statements, illustrated with real-world examples.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/72968437/ asked by the user 'JabbaThePadd' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/14897335/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/72992080/ provided by the user 'JabbaThePadd' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/14897335/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: PySpark query performance - join vs when

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/licensing
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding PySpark Query Performance: Join vs When

When working with large datasets in PySpark, performance is key, especially when manipulating multiple DataFrames. A common task involves transforming data under certain conditions and then joining those DataFrames. However, developers often find that the choice of implementation—using when statements or joins—can significantly impact performance. This guide examines two approaches to a similar problem, highlights the performance differences, and explains why one method often outperforms the other.

The Challenge

In the scenario we've been presented with, we have two DataFrames:

purDf: ~432.8 MiB

ticDf: ~9.3 GiB

The goal is to transform these DataFrames based on specific conditions before performing a join on them. The developer tested two alternatives:

Alternative 1: Using multiple when statements in the query.

Alternative 2: Utilizing joins to minimize the when statements.

Performance Results

Alternative 1: Took approximately 40 seconds to execute.

Alternative 2: Completed in about 22 seconds.

Initially, Alternative 2 seemed to perform better, but as the investigation revealed, the result was deceptive due to how Spark executes operations under the hood.

Analyzing the Alternatives

Alternative 1

In the first alternative, the developer used multiple when statements to transform the ticDf before joining it with purDf. The method revolved around conditional data handling directly in the query.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Alternative 2

The second alternative pre-processed the ticDf using smaller DataFrames to simplify conditional handling and eventually joined them together. The strategy was aimed at improving performance by reducing the complexity of the transformations performed at once.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The Root Cause of Performance Differences

After running some tests, the developer discovered that the observed slow performance of Alternative 1 was influenced by Spark’s Lazy Evaluation. Initially, both DataFrames had been defined and cached but not loaded into memory. The first execution of Alternative 1 involved loading the DataFrames, which skewed the timing results when compared to Alternative 2.

Key Insights:

Lazy Evaluation: Spark delays loading data until an action is required, which can impact the initial run time of queries.

Parallel Execution: When statements can be executed across different partitions independently, leading to faster processing without the need for shuffling data—something that occurs with joins.

Shuffling Overhead: Joins typically require sorting and shuffling data, which adds to the execution time.

Adjusting the Approach

By preloading and caching the DataFrames before running the tests again, the original developer found that Alternative 1 became more efficient. The execution time actually favored Alternative 1 once it was allowed to load its data efficiently upfront.

Conclusion

In the realm of PySpark, apparent performance metrics can be misleading if not understood correctly. The choice between using when statements or joins can heavily depend on the specific situation, including the initial setup of DataFrames and how they are manipulated.

In summary:

Use when Statements: For parallel processing capabilities with independent transformations.

Use Joins: When the need arises for combining datasets that cannot be easily merged using when logic.

By understanding the underlying mechanics of Spark, you can better optimize your queries and ensure that you're utilizing the most efficient methods for your data operations.

Remember, always cache your DataFrames as needed and assess your query plans for be

Видео Understanding PySpark Query Performance: Join vs When канала vlogize