Think Twice Before Defaulting! ⚠️ NCLAT Slams Debtors ‘Blowing Hot & Cold’ | IBC 2016
Can a corporate debtor escape insolvency proceedings by signing a settlement… and then dishonoring it? 🤔
In its landmark order dated 22nd September 2025, the NCLAT in Dnyaneshwar Shankar Unde vs. Shukla Dairy Pvt. Ltd. gave a strong message: corporate debtors cannot “blow hot and cold.” If a settlement fails, the creditor has the right to restore the insolvency petition.
👉 In this detailed video, we cover:
Background of the case under Section 9, IBC 2016
Settlement terms and breach by the corporate debtor
NCLAT’s sharp observations on “blowing hot and cold”
Revival of the original insolvency petition
Key legal lessons for creditors, insolvency professionals, and corporate debtors
⚖️ Final Ruling: The NCLAT restored the original petition, reinforcing that settlements cannot be misused as a tool to escape CIRP.
🔑 Key Learning: Always ensure that settlement orders explicitly include a revival clause. This protects creditor rights if the debtor defaults again.
📖 Stay tuned till the end for practical insights and professional takeaways on insolvency law in India.
✨ If you find this video helpful, don’t forget to Like, Share & Subscribe for more updates on IBC, NCLT/NCLAT rulings, and corporate law.
📢 Follow us for more updates:
https://www.youtube.com/@RamanareddyFCS/playlists
https://www.youtube.com/@Ramana-legal/playlists
www.youtube.com/@RamanareddyFCS
www.youtube.com/@Ramana-legal
#NCLAT #IBC2016 #InsolvencyLaw #CorporateDebtors #NCLT #InsolvencyAndBankruptcyCode #LegalUpdate #CorporateLawIndia #IBCJudgment #SettlementBreach #CIRP #OperationalCreditor #CompanyLaw #InsolvencyProceedings #IndianLaw
Видео Think Twice Before Defaulting! ⚠️ NCLAT Slams Debtors ‘Blowing Hot & Cold’ | IBC 2016 канала RR Corporates
In its landmark order dated 22nd September 2025, the NCLAT in Dnyaneshwar Shankar Unde vs. Shukla Dairy Pvt. Ltd. gave a strong message: corporate debtors cannot “blow hot and cold.” If a settlement fails, the creditor has the right to restore the insolvency petition.
👉 In this detailed video, we cover:
Background of the case under Section 9, IBC 2016
Settlement terms and breach by the corporate debtor
NCLAT’s sharp observations on “blowing hot and cold”
Revival of the original insolvency petition
Key legal lessons for creditors, insolvency professionals, and corporate debtors
⚖️ Final Ruling: The NCLAT restored the original petition, reinforcing that settlements cannot be misused as a tool to escape CIRP.
🔑 Key Learning: Always ensure that settlement orders explicitly include a revival clause. This protects creditor rights if the debtor defaults again.
📖 Stay tuned till the end for practical insights and professional takeaways on insolvency law in India.
✨ If you find this video helpful, don’t forget to Like, Share & Subscribe for more updates on IBC, NCLT/NCLAT rulings, and corporate law.
📢 Follow us for more updates:
https://www.youtube.com/@RamanareddyFCS/playlists
https://www.youtube.com/@Ramana-legal/playlists
www.youtube.com/@RamanareddyFCS
www.youtube.com/@Ramana-legal
#NCLAT #IBC2016 #InsolvencyLaw #CorporateDebtors #NCLT #InsolvencyAndBankruptcyCode #LegalUpdate #CorporateLawIndia #IBCJudgment #SettlementBreach #CIRP #OperationalCreditor #CompanyLaw #InsolvencyProceedings #IndianLaw
Видео Think Twice Before Defaulting! ⚠️ NCLAT Slams Debtors ‘Blowing Hot & Cold’ | IBC 2016 канала RR Corporates
NCLAT order 2025 NCLT IBC 2016 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Corporate Debtor Settlement breach Revival of insolvency petition CIRP India Operational creditor rights Section 9 IBC Shukla Dairy case Dnyaneshwar Shankar Unde case Insolvency proceedings Corporate law India Legal update NCLAT judgment Blowing hot and cold doctrine Company law compliance IBC jurisprudence Indian corporate law
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
25 сентября 2025 г. 10:30:23
00:05:45
Другие видео канала