Testing AI and Human Legal Reasoning

Can AI help law students understand legal materials—or does it weaken the learning process?

In this segment, Daniel Schwarcz walks through the University of Minnesota study on AI and human legal reasoning, including the randomized control trial, the legal tasks students completed, and the hypothesis the researchers set out to test.

The study examines whether students who used AI to synthesize legal materials could still apply those rules later when the AI was taken away.

From AI and the Future of Law with Jen Leonard and Bridget McCormack.

Subscribe for more on AI and the Future of Law
Listen on Spotify, Apple Podcasts & more:

AAA: https://www.adr.org/podcasts/ai-and-the-future-of-law/
PLI: https://www.pli.edu/catalog/podcasts/ai-and-the-future-of-the-law
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/2eavMpnebcCHG3Y86oXIeD
Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ai-and-the-future-of-law/id1751625159

#AIinLaw #LegalEducation #LawSchool #LegalReasoning #FutureOfLaw

Видео Testing AI and Human Legal Reasoning канала AI and the Future of Law Podcast