How to Weaken a LSAT Sample Size by Identifying Bias Using LawHub Logical Reasoning Drill Set 12

Watch expert #lsat tutor, Stefan Maisnier, demonstrate how to specifically highlight the conclusion, and the necessary referents, of a given prompt, broadly predict what would weaken that conclusion, in this case confirming that the sample may biased due to a reverse causation flaw, and then seek an answer choice broadly matching that prediction to answer Question 2 from Logical Reasoning Drill Set 12. By watching this demonstration that uses free official resources from lawhub.lsac.org, you will learn how to execute a similar style of argument and answer evaluation using the available interface highlighting tools for subsequent weaken an argument question tasks on future practice or official LSAT exams.

Please like this video if you find the information in it helpful as you continue your #lsatprep journey, subscribe to this channel to receive notifications about new explanation videos as they become available, or become a member at
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCe9y4Fr62WPItIYONOdyKPw/join for access to exclusive explanations to additional LSAT PrepTest and LawHub Drill Set practice problems.

To learn more about the LSAT or the law school application process, visit the MyGuru LSAT & Law School Admissions blog at www.myguruedge.com/our-thinking/lsat-and-the-law-school-admissions-process or visit https://www.myguruedge.com/book_intro_session to book a free LSAT instruction consultation. To learn more about the instructor, visit https://www.myguruedge.com/team/stefan-maisnier

LSAC LawHub LSAT Logical Reasoning Drill Set 12, Question 2:

In a typical university class in calculus, only 20 percent of the students regularly come to session devoted to practicing techniques for solving standard calculus problems. On average, those 20 percent get much better grades in the course than do their classmates who skip these sessions. It is clear, therefore, that the practice sessions help students attending them learn how to solve calculus problems more effectively.

2. Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the argument?

A) Some students who attend the practice sessions are no faster at solving calculus problems than are their classmates who skip the sessions.
B) Students who attend the practice sessions are more likely to go on to take further mathematics courses than are their classmates who skip the sessions.
C) Students who attends the practice sessions are likely to want to receive high grades in their university calculus class.
D) Students who do their homework regularly are more likely to attend the practice sessions than are students who do not do their homework regularly. (Correct)
E) Students who skip the practice sessions are just as likely to show up for other sessions of the class as are students who attend the practice sessions.

Видео How to Weaken a LSAT Sample Size by Identifying Bias Using LawHub Logical Reasoning Drill Set 12 канала MyGuru Tutoring