RoB 2.0: A revised tool to assess risk of bias in randomized trials pt3
The revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials (RoB 2.0) builds on the established Cochrane risk-of-bias tool first released through the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions in 2008 and updated in 2011. The development team have reacted to feedback and evaluations of the original tool and made several amendments and improvements.
This webinar, which is part of the Cochrane Learning Live series, is presented by Dr Matthew Page, who demonstrates the improvements and changes in RoB 2.0.
Видео RoB 2.0: A revised tool to assess risk of bias in randomized trials pt3 канала Cochrane Training
This webinar, which is part of the Cochrane Learning Live series, is presented by Dr Matthew Page, who demonstrates the improvements and changes in RoB 2.0.
Видео RoB 2.0: A revised tool to assess risk of bias in randomized trials pt3 канала Cochrane Training
Показать
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
Другие видео канала
RoB 2.0: A revised tool to assess risk of bias in randomized trials pt4Systematic Review Webinars by IMPACT - SESSION 7 - Quality Assessment & Risk of BiasPart 3: Risk of bias in the effect of assignment to interventionPart 2: An overview of RoB 2RoB 2.0: A revised tool to assess risk of bias in randomized trials pt1RoB 2.0: A revised tool to assess risk of bias in randomized trials pt2Part 3: Assessing the RoB due to missing outcome dataConcealed Allocation: What Is It and Why Is It Important?Intro to Systematic Reviews & Meta-AnalysesPart 1: From the original Cochrane risk of bias tool to RoB 2RoB 2.0: A revised tool to assess risk of bias in randomized trialsIntroduction to RevMan 5Part 4: A worked exampleRandomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)Doing scoping reviewsPart 3: Assessing risk of bias from the randomization process in RoB 2Incorporating Risk-of-Bias Assessments into Evidence Syntheses with {robvis}Intention-to-treat (ITT) and other forms of data analysisFeatures and benefits of a systematic reviewPart 1: The GRADE-CERQual approach