Scala: How to Pass in Child Class While Returning the Same Child Class Type in Generics

Learn how to effectively manage generics in Scala with child classes and ensure type safety using practical examples.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/66574479/ asked by the user 'Mylies' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/11069078/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/66574829/ provided by the user 'Dima' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/4254517/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Scala how to pass in child class and then return the same child class type while getting it generic?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/licensing
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Generics in Scala with Child Classes

Generics in Scala provide a powerful way to write flexible and reusable code. However, when you work with inheritance and polymorphism, passing in child classes while returning a specific type can become tricky. In this guide, we will explore a common scenario where you need to pass a child class and return the same child class type while utilizing generics in Scala.

The Problem

Imagine you have the following method definition in your Scala code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Here, CacheKey is a trait with a method called buildCacheKey. You also have a case class IDCacheKey that extends this trait and adds a unique identifier (id). Your goal is to create a function that uses IDCacheKey to fetch values based on the id property. However, batchCacheable currently accepts a sequence of CacheKey, and you need it to specifically handle a sequence of IDCacheKey.

The Core of the Issue

The crux of the problem lies in the fact that while batchCacheable can accept a Seq[CacheKey], you require it to handle a Seq[IDCacheKey] for your processing needs. This type mismatch can lead to compile-time errors and hinder your code’s effectiveness.

The Solution

To overcome this challenge, we can use several approaches. Let’s break them down into clear, manageable sections.

1. Filtering with collect

One straightforward solution is to filter your sequence of CacheKey instances. You can redefine your function getStringsFromLMS as follows:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This approach uses collect, which will safely ignore any instances that are not of type IDCacheKey. However, if you want to ensure type integrity and throw an error for invalid types, you can replace collect with map:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

While this does solve your immediate problem, it's not the most elegant or correct solution, as it violates the principle that a CacheKey should provide adequate identity to fetch the value.

2. Refine the CacheKey Trait

A more robust solution is to enhance the CacheKey trait by adding an abstract method to provide an identity. You could modify it as follows:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

With this change, both IDCacheKey and any other child classes of CacheKey can provide their identifiers, which can be seamlessly accessed in the getStringsFromLMS method without any type-related issues.

3. Parameterizing batchCacheable

Another alternative is to further parameterize your batchCacheable function to allow it to handle the specifics of the child class. You can define it like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This approach allows getStringsFromLMS to directly accept IDCacheKey while still being compatible with the batchCacheable method, enhancing the type safety of your application.

Conclusion

Navigating generics, inheritance, and polymorphism in Scala can be complex, but understanding how to manage child classes effectively can streamline your code. By using the strategies outlined in this post—closing your CacheKey with an id method and properly parameterizing your functions—you can ensure that your Scala applications are robust, type-safe, and maintainable.

By approaching the problem with an eye towards type safety and code clarity, you can design systems that are not only effective but also intuitive to maintain and extend in the future.

Видео Scala: How to Pass in Child Class While Returning the Same Child Class Type in Generics канала vlogize