- Популярные видео
- Авто
- Видео-блоги
- ДТП, аварии
- Для маленьких
- Еда, напитки
- Животные
- Закон и право
- Знаменитости
- Игры
- Искусство
- Комедии
- Красота, мода
- Кулинария, рецепты
- Люди
- Мото
- Музыка
- Мультфильмы
- Наука, технологии
- Новости
- Образование
- Политика
- Праздники
- Приколы
- Природа
- Происшествия
- Путешествия
- Развлечения
- Ржач
- Семья
- Сериалы
- Спорт
- Стиль жизни
- ТВ передачи
- Танцы
- Технологии
- Товары
- Ужасы
- Фильмы
- Шоу-бизнес
- Юмор
Nintendo's Patent Wasn't Revoked — Here's What Happened
The USPTO didn't "revoke" Nintendo's Pokémon patent — they issued a non-final rejection, and here's what that actually means for the Palworld lawsuit.
I'm Curt Lockhart, a patent attorney working with startup founders. In Part One I covered the original Nintendo vs. Pocketpair case and predicted Nintendo would try to amend their claims under reexamination. The US Patent Office just issued the next move, and most of the gaming press is reporting it wrong. Here's what actually happened, what "non-final rejection" really means, and the lesson founders should take from it.
🔗 Book a free consultation: https://calendly.com/lockhart_ip/quick-chat?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=video&utm_campaign=nintendo-palworld-update
⏱️ Timestamps:
0:00 - Why I'm Doing a Part Two
0:48 - Where We Left Off & What Just Happened
1:36 - Non-Final Rejection is not Patent Revoked
2:51 - What "Obviousness" Actually Requires
4:16 - Nintendo Already Has a Backup Plan
6:05 - The Tokyo Lawsuit Is a Separate Fight
6:33 - The Lesson for Founders
7:34 - What's Next
🔗 Connect with me: https://usip.law/curt
📺 Related Videos:
▶️ Can Nintendo Sue Games That Look Like Pokémon? (Part One): https://youtu.be/IaVUuDtxTf8
#startuplegal #patentlaw #nintendo #palworld #ipstrategy
___________________________________________________________________________________
DISCLAIMER: This YouTube channel is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should not rely on any information on this YouTube channel as legal advice. Viewing this YouTube channel or any of its content does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Lockhart IP, or any of its attorneys. Comments, messages, and other communications sent to this YouTube channel do not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information transmitted is not protected by privilege or confidentiality. Lockhart IP makes no representation, warranty, or guarantee about the accuracy of the information contained in this YouTube channel or in links to other third-party sources. You should not act or rely on any of the information contained in this YouTube channel without seeking professional legal advice.
Copyright © Lockhart IP LLC | All Rights Reserved.
Видео Nintendo's Patent Wasn't Revoked — Here's What Happened канала Curt Lockhart | IP Attorney for Startup Founders
I'm Curt Lockhart, a patent attorney working with startup founders. In Part One I covered the original Nintendo vs. Pocketpair case and predicted Nintendo would try to amend their claims under reexamination. The US Patent Office just issued the next move, and most of the gaming press is reporting it wrong. Here's what actually happened, what "non-final rejection" really means, and the lesson founders should take from it.
🔗 Book a free consultation: https://calendly.com/lockhart_ip/quick-chat?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=video&utm_campaign=nintendo-palworld-update
⏱️ Timestamps:
0:00 - Why I'm Doing a Part Two
0:48 - Where We Left Off & What Just Happened
1:36 - Non-Final Rejection is not Patent Revoked
2:51 - What "Obviousness" Actually Requires
4:16 - Nintendo Already Has a Backup Plan
6:05 - The Tokyo Lawsuit Is a Separate Fight
6:33 - The Lesson for Founders
7:34 - What's Next
🔗 Connect with me: https://usip.law/curt
📺 Related Videos:
▶️ Can Nintendo Sue Games That Look Like Pokémon? (Part One): https://youtu.be/IaVUuDtxTf8
#startuplegal #patentlaw #nintendo #palworld #ipstrategy
___________________________________________________________________________________
DISCLAIMER: This YouTube channel is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should not rely on any information on this YouTube channel as legal advice. Viewing this YouTube channel or any of its content does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Lockhart IP, or any of its attorneys. Comments, messages, and other communications sent to this YouTube channel do not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information transmitted is not protected by privilege or confidentiality. Lockhart IP makes no representation, warranty, or guarantee about the accuracy of the information contained in this YouTube channel or in links to other third-party sources. You should not act or rely on any of the information contained in this YouTube channel without seeking professional legal advice.
Copyright © Lockhart IP LLC | All Rights Reserved.
Видео Nintendo's Patent Wasn't Revoked — Here's What Happened канала Curt Lockhart | IP Attorney for Startup Founders
director ordered reexamination ex parte reexamination gameplay patent ip law for startups nintendo gameplay mechanics patent nintendo palworld patent update nintendo pokemon patent rejected palworld lawsuit patent attorney analysis patent claims rejected patent law for game developers patent obviousness patent reexamination patent strategy for founders uspto patent rejection
Комментарии отсутствуют
Информация о видео
3 мая 2026 г. 7:16:53
00:08:43
Другие видео канала





















