Understanding the Time Complexity of Insertion Sort: Why It Remains Θ(n²)

Explore why the time complexity of Insertion Sort stays Θ(n²) despite using binary search for insertion. Learn about the mechanics behind this algorithm and its efficiency.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/66411158/ asked by the user 'thePIVOT' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/14044292/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/66411648/ provided by the user 'Eloy Pérez Torres' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/13743105/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Insertion sort time complexity

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/licensing
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the Time Complexity of Insertion Sort: Why It Remains Θ(n²)

Sorting algorithms play a vital role in computer science, and understanding their efficiencies can help us choose the right one for our tasks. One of the classical sorting algorithms is Insertion Sort, which, despite its simplicity, has some nuances in its time complexity that are essential to understand when coding or analyzing algorithms.

The Core Question: Insertion Sort and Time Complexity

Recently, a question was posed regarding the time complexity of Insertion Sort when using binary search to identify insertion points. The central query was: Does the time complexity change when binary search is utilized instead of linear search? The provided options led to some confusion, so let’s dive into the details and clarify why the correct answer is A) remain Θ(n²).

What is Insertion Sort?

Before we dissect the time complexity, let’s quickly revisit what Insertion Sort is. The algorithm builds a sorted part of the array one element at a time. Here’s how it generally works:

The array is divided into two parts: a sorted and an unsorted part.

Elements from the unsorted part are picked one at a time and inserted into the correct position within the sorted part, thus growing the sorted section.

Time Complexity Basics

Insertion Sort’s time complexity can be analyzed in two contexts:

Best Case: When the array is already sorted, resulting in Θ(n) time.

Worst Case: When the array is sorted in reverse order, leading to Θ(n²) time.

The worst-case scenario occurs because for each element, you must potentially compare it against all of the elements already in the sorted part, leading to a quadratic number of comparisons and shifts.

The Role of Binary Search

In the question, the consideration of using binary search rather than linear search was proposed. Though this adjustment allows us to determine the insertion point of each element more efficiently (in Θ(log n) time), it does not eliminate the necessity to shift elements after the insertion point. This is a critical insight!

Examining the Shifting Process

When you find the insertion point using binary search:

You still need to shift every element that is greater than the newly inserted element one position to the right.

This shifting operation is where the quadratic time complexity reemerges.

Examples of Element Shifting:

If the element at index 0 is the largest in the list, every subsequent insertion requires moving every element to the right.

For each insertion, if k elements are shifted (where k is the current index), the total shifts over n elements accumulate to Θ(n²).

Thus, even with an efficient search for insertion points, the overall complexity does not improve beyond Θ(n²).

Conclusion and Further Reading

To summarize, Insertion Sort maintains a time complexity of Θ(n²), even when adopting binary search for finding insertion points. The necessity of shifting elements continues to dominate the computational cost. This highlights an essential characteristic of many sorting algorithms: their performances can often be counter-intuitive at first glance!

For those interested in further exploring different sorting algorithms and their time complexities, I recommend looking into reliable resources such as the book Introduction to Algorithms by Cormen et al.

If you have any further questions on sorting algorithms or time complexity, feel free to ask!

Видео Understanding the Time Complexity of Insertion Sort: Why It Remains Θ(n²) канала vlogize