Mliswa’s Constitutional Confusion EXPOSED | The Referendum They’re Avoiding

Zimbabwe’s Constitutional Amendment No. 3 is triggering serious national debate.

Some argue the process is fully constitutional because Parliament is following procedure.

But here’s the critical question:

Is the Constitution being followed in full — including its referendum safeguards?

In this Zimwaves TV investigation, we break down:

• What constitutionalism actually means
• Why the 2013 Constitution includes referendum requirements for certain changes
• Whether Parliament truly represents the entire population in a winner-takes-all electoral system
• The implications of avoiding a referendum
• Why Sengezo Tshabangu threatening elected opposition MPs raises serious representation concerns
• The difference between majority rule and constitutional limits

The Constitution was not designed to empower majorities without restraint.
It was designed to limit power — whoever holds it.

If certain amendments require direct public approval, then bypassing that safeguard raises legitimate constitutional questions.

This is not noise.
This is democratic scrutiny.

📢 Do you believe Amendment No. 3 should go to a national referendum?

Comment YES or NO — and explain your position.

👉 Subscribe to Zimwaves TV for fearless constitutional analysis, governance breakdowns, and political commentary you won’t hear on state platforms.

#Zimbabwe #ConstitutionalAmendment #Amendment3 #Referendum #Mliswa #Tshabangu #ZANUPF #ZimwavesTV

Видео Mliswa’s Constitutional Confusion EXPOSED | The Referendum They’re Avoiding канала Zimwaves TV