Is Passing Modules as Parameters in JavaScript: Good or Bad Practice?

Explore whether passing modules as parameters to constructors in JavaScript is a best practice or just a confusing method. Let’s break down the pros and cons of this technique in Node.js development.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/70218826/ asked by the user 'amy' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/12410126/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/70221734/ provided by the user 'jfriend00' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/816620/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Passing modules as argument parameters to other modules constructors: good or bad practise?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/licensing
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Is Passing Modules as Parameters in JavaScript: Good or Bad Practice?

In the world of JavaScript programming, particularly with Node.js, one common practice is how modules interact with each other. A developer raised a poignant question: Is it a good or bad practice to pass a module as an argument to another module’s constructor? This simple question unravels complex considerations about code clarity, dependency management, and modular design. Let's explore this thought-provoking issue further.

Understanding the Problem

The crux of the issue is demonstrated in an example where modules A, B, and C interact in a way that may appear confusing at first glance. Here’s a brief overview of the setup:

Module A exports a function and a variable:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Module B does not require A directly; instead, it accepts it as a parameter to its initialization function:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Module C brings it all together:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This structure allows Module B to use exports from Module A without requiring it directly. But is this approach advisable?

The Solution: Analyzing the Practice

Summary: It Depends

The answer to whether this is a good or bad practice largely falls in the realm of ‘it depends.’ This approach is not common in Node.js development, where most modules tend to load their own dependencies directly. However, there are exceptions where allowing an external module to supply an interface can be useful.

Pros and Cons

Advantages of Passing Modules as Parameters:

Flexibility: This technique can allow a calling module to customize how dependencies are implemented, as shown with a logging function that can take different forms.

Decoupling: It can reduce tight coupling in certain scenarios, allowing developers to inject dependencies as needed.

Disadvantages:

Code Complexity: It adds unnecessary complexity by hiding dependencies, which can lead to confusion, especially for new developers or when revisiting code after a time.

Static Analysis: This method can break static dependency analysis in many development tools. Coders may lose features like "go-to-declaration" since the modules aren't explicitly stated.

Documentation: Additional mental overhead and documentation are required to explain how modules interact, making the codebase harder to grasp.

Typical Practices in JavaScript

In standard practices, especially with core Node.js modules, you usually see syntax like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Here, the module imports all dependencies explicitly, making it easier to read, understand, and maintain. Most developers favor this approach, which is straightforward and supports tools that analyze code dependencies effectively.

When to Consider Passing Modules

There are rare instances where passing a module as a parameter is sensible, such as when creating highly generic libraries meant for wide usage. Considerations include:

Extensibility: If your module may benefit from being adapted to different logging mechanisms or other functionalities, this method allows users to customize the integration.

Specific Use Cases: If your module is designed for high-customizability, providing a framework for users to define certain interfaces may be necessary.

Conclusion

Deciding whether to pass modules as parameters depends largely on the context of your project and the balance between flexibility and clarity. For most cases, following the conventional method of requiring modules directly tends to maintain code readability and ease of use.

As a best practic

Видео Is Passing Modules as Parameters in JavaScript: Good or Bad Practice? канала vlogize